Adding the word "scientific" to your point doesn't make it more believable.
In fact, it detracts from your point by making you sound like you don't know how to use the word.
LongerDonger
joined 1 year ago
The source is Lover In Law.
It's engagement farming.
Notice how they're all questions? The way this works on other social media is you ask something in a community that most people will have an opinion on, but frame it opposite to that opinion (e.g. the tiny tits question), and that will give you a bunch of engagement through comments which tells the algorithm the post is more interesting so it pushes the post higher to raise visibility to keep people on the site longer to view more ads.
The thing is, Lemmy does not have an algorithm like that, so it's pointless to do here.
Original artist appears to be shengtian.
How would you know when to turn to that page though?
If it tells you at the start to turn to that page and you do, does it tell you the story from 80-90% of the way through? Or is it a totally new short story since you haven't started yet?
Or just... Use your eyes to tell roughly how old they are. No point fussing over details when it's not even a real person.
Oh yeah, I see what you mean now :/
Looks alright to me. Which part would you say is botched?
Fucking hell. Absolutely stellar.
If you like this kind of stuff, I'd recommend checking out their other art!
Yes! I asked her before I started. I may be a degenerate, but I'm not that bad.