It also repeatedly calls this is a proxy war, which is simply not true based on, ya know, definitions of words.
Here's a guy who disagrees. But what does he know, he's just a former CIA Director and Secretary of Defense: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2022-03-17/u-s-is-in-a-proxy-war-with-russia-panetta-video
checks my own posting history
Looks fine to me. Oh wait, I'm linking to those well known pro-Russia and pro-China outlets, the Associated Press, Reuters, and the New York Times. Don't listen to me, I'll corrupt your soul with heterodox articles about publicly available government documents.
Can you give examples of the article's problems?
Ah yes, character assassination that doesn't address the content of the article -- which quotes journalists from mutliple outlets and doesn't involve Greenwald. A picture of unbiased, non-misleading discourse.
Now with fewer child mutilations! 👍