Rangelus

joined 1 year ago
[–] Rangelus 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Regardless of what the truth is around this article, the more Te Reo used by the public sector the better.

I've learned more Te Reo in the last 6 years than I have in the rest of my life, including primary school. And this is a good thing!

[–] Rangelus 2 points 6 months ago

Horrible. I will vote for any party that commits to throttling political donations.

Hell, I reckon all parties should get a fixed amount for advertising and promotion during the election, paid for by the electoral commission and fees parties pay!

[–] Rangelus 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I know esun is quite popular, but I never tried it.

I've generally had the best results with it. Ironically, before the upgrades I had almost no stringing.

I'm using a 0.4mm nozzle. I probably should have mentioned in the OP that I didn't have problems before, but the upgrades have happened in addition to moving to Orcaslicer.

Now I'm worried if I've got my Bowden tube seated in the hotend correctly...

[–] Rangelus 8 points 6 months ago

Thanks for the reply mate!

I didn't think to mess with z-hop - I'll give that a go, and I'll do some testing to make sure the Bowden is seated correctly and the wipe on retract is actually happening - thanks!

The print in the image is a 'torture test', and just something I had on hand to illustrate the issue. I'm actually not fussed if there is still some stringing at the top, but other detailed prints were getting it pretty bad, including retraction towers.

[–] Rangelus 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

They obviously don't, because you're literally the only one here trying to argue the messenger and not the message.

[–] Rangelus 1 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I don't care about the tone, I don't think they are serious, I think they are using hyperbole to bring attention to the issue. They are a minor party, I doubt we would be talking about it otherwise.

I am capable of engaging in the discussion without focussing only on the tone of message and dismissing everything else.

[–] Rangelus 1 points 6 months ago (5 children)

It's not a particularly nuanced statement in the first place, is it?

You know full well what their intent is with this rhetoric. You know full well the point they are trying to raise. The fact that you insist on arguing about the messenger and tone of message shows you don't want to engage with the problem being raised in good faith.

[–] Rangelus 1 points 6 months ago

Hmm, sync posted the reply as a top level comment. Weird.

[–] Rangelus 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

No nuance with you huh?

[–] Rangelus 1 points 6 months ago (7 children)

If you think that's the message TPM is trying to get across, then you are dumber than I gave you credit.

[–] Rangelus 4 points 6 months ago

Fuck this noise. This government is exhausting.

[–] Rangelus 3 points 6 months ago (9 children)

You always bring up the messenger and ignore the message. No-one else here does that so regularly.

This is why formal logic should be taught in schools. Saying that the way the messenger gets their message across is the reason to ignore the message is the very definition of Ad Hominem.

view more: ‹ prev next ›