Reality

Lemmy would need to be less niche and discoverability of subs needs to be better I'd say. Otherwise it's fine already.

I liked: not flossing is like pooping but only cleaning the cheeks.

Citation needed. Something to show me that I should totally distrust Chinese car brands outside of China. Something like this example

Doesn't Iceland have some form of parliament that includes everyone for a thousand years?

It isn't. Latin does not use the letter k.

Splitting gas diesel and hybrids is misleading in this stat. Once EV beats all of the above, true progress is on the horizon.

Ronaldinho and Ronaldo. 2 of Brazils best players ever. Ronaldo used to be the record holder of most goals shot over multiple world cups, until Miroslav Klose beat his record, which was beaten again this world cup by Lionel Messi.

But that's beside the point. Linus wrote that the Linux project will always accept good code to improve the technology, regardless of source. If Microsoft would wake up tomorrow and switch the kernel to Linux and start to send PR for good features, Linus would add them in a heartbeat. Same as the rust decision. If it's bad, it gets rejected, LLM or not. That is the entire fucking point.

There is no room for fascists.

Of course not. But saying an entire framework is bad is silly. That is my entire point. Thanks for agreeing with me.

Native what? AoT compiled dotnet code? Bad C++ code?

Compares to what? Electron apps or ffmpeg level of assembler?