The last DVD burned was a release candidate for Debian buster. The last CD was a full i386 install of OpenBSD 6.4 for a ThinkPad T43p. Both happened in the last decade (2010's).
I've ripped several music CD's and movie DVD's since then, but using it as a storage device just isn't a thing any more.
It would be better to attract people who actually want to use an OS that is different to Windows, rather than ones that just want a Windows that works. Linux is not a version of Windows.
Absolute agreement.
Around the turn of the century, we used to say something like, "Linux is for people who hate Microsoft, BSD is for people who love UNIX."
Not much has changed in the larger discussion about Desktop Linux. General discussion is driven by how "safe" and "comfortable" Windows users feel installing and using it for the first time. It's a bullshit discussion.
It's a weird relationship, like a new girlfriend who is always comparing you to the last boyfriend who beat her. She may even go back to him because he is familiar, without ever recognizing that you are better in every way.
Linux as a desktop is perfectly fine and usable on it's own, without comparison to Windows. I've used it for over a quarter century and had a normal life, from middle school through postgrad and a decade-long career. My kids use it for everything including school and gaming and have no problems making friends and turning in assignments. People need to get out of the poverty mindset that Windows is the standard for a desktop. It's fucking terrible. Linux has been usable for the desktop for 25 fucking years for those who want it. Windows itself copied many things from the Linux desktop, going all the way back to the first themes on Windows XP, and now there's an entire Linux subsystem for Windows, all because Linux has been been better at package management and dependency resolution since the Clinton administration. Windows is fucking awful as a desktop.
They've also become really, really good at outsourcing R&D to other companies. This lets them outsource the expense of trial and error, and swoop down with a mature product once everyone else has paid for it.
15 years ago they famously patented, and then leaked that they were working on a fingerprint reader authentication method, and then they watched the Android manufacturers bend over backwards to implement it so they could say they did it "first." In those early days of smartphones, being first to implement something and then claiming Apple copied it was a big deal for people who wanted to be first movers (today they are called "techbros"). Motorola Mobility ate the cost of R&D, was never able to recoup the costs, and ended up being sold to Google for their patent portfolio. By the time Apple released Touch ID two and a half years later, Motorola Mobility was a shell of itself, and ended up being sold a second time to Lenovo.
Foldable phones have been a thing for a while, and Apple just sat back and took notes on what everyone else was doing. Surface Duo killed Microsoft's last attempt at a mobile device. Now it's a relatively mature market (we have tri-fold phones for two years now and tablets that fold into a laptop with a bluetooth keyboard) and now Apple will swoop in and bring the rest of the market.
The money isn't in being a first mover; it's in making a reliable product that everyone can use. It shouldn't be lost on anyone that Apple made a trillion dollars while OpenBSD (upstream for a lot of Apple's ecosystem) struggled to pay its light bills.
Thunderbird since forever. Before that, Seamonkey and the Mozilla suite.
There are some changes I didn't like over the years like the tabbed interface for everything, but nothing else ever came along that worked as well and was multi-platform.
. I personally think that a lot of this could be resolved by turning display brightness levels down, but people like what they like.
It's the opposite: turn the brighness on an OLED display to 100% and the eyestrain ends because the flickering goes away. Pulse width modulation is used for dimming OLED displays -- that means turning the screen off and on again in a very quick manner -- to simulate a darker screen. It's fast enough for your brain to think it's a dimmer screen, but slow enough that the muscles in your eyes still react to the sudden on/off again flashing, which results in eyestrain and headaches. A lot of cheap OLED panels flicker at only 240Hz at anything below 100% brightness, resulting in eyestrain. Chinese phones have gotten around this by using things like DC dimming (lowering the voltage to the diodes) or increasing the rate of the flicker to greater than 1KHz (called high frequency pwm dimming), which is fast enough that your eye muscles don't notice the flicker.
It's enough of an issue that Apple followed suit, having just moved to high frequency pwm dimming as a "new" feature on the iPhone 17 last month. They call the feature "Display Pulse Smoothing" and describe it as:
"Disables pulse width modulation to provide a different way to dim the OLED display, which can create a smoother display output at low brightness levels. Disabling PWM may affect low brightness display performance under certain conditions."
Note that the pwm flicker rate is different than the refresh rate, which has to do with how quickly things are drawn on the screen.
How it relates to e-ink, I do not know. About a decade ago, most e-ink e-readers got backlights and I remember buying the then newest Nook that had a backlight. I would read before going to bed, and as I closed my eyes, I would see flashing light in the outline of the Nook, like a residual effect of screen flicker. I am on a Kobo Libra 2 now and no longer have this flickering issue.
Regarding the Boox, this is a form factor that I've always wanted for an e-reader, to use on public transit. I think it's a fine size for my kids as well. But I'll wait and see after launch if the current version is discounted and get it from Taobao.
There is a national law called in China called PIPL, modeled after the GDPR, that limits what companies can do with the private data collected about individuals.
Outside of California, not much exists in the USA to protect privacy.
I'm not going to pretend that either country is not authoritarian. But a lot of the narrative about China is just propaganda. Here at least I can bicycle safely to work, take an electric car if I need a taxi, not worry about medical bankruptcy from a hospital stay, and not be deported because we are brown or worry that my kids will get shot at school.
Ask me ten years ago and this was a different answer. But conditions change (in both countries), we must adapt, so here we are.
Maybe my perspective is skewed because I live in Beijing and spent most of my life in the USA, but I think the US is worse on privacy.
Install the apparmor profiles and extra profiles packages from the apt repository. They are sensible restrictions on common apps (web browsers) to prevent anything malicious from happening if they are ever hijacked. Make sure apparmor is enabled. This will do more to keep you secure than an antivirus.
If you insist on an AV, install ClamAV and have it scan weekly. It's libre software and works well with Linux.
Yeah when doorbells sell your facial recognition to the USG just because you walked by someone's house, when your wifi password is stored by Google or Microsoft or Apple and sold for profit, when every company under the sun has been breached with no financial or legal repercussion, when everyone is complicit at selling your information while censoring your speech based on Trump's whims, who cares about privacy? China privacy fears? If China wanted your information, they would just buy it from the American companies you "trust" who are selling it on the open market.
When American cars are being recalled because the engines are dying under 20k miles (Chevy V8) and $50k "rugged" vehicles come with plastic oil pans (Ford Bronco), and nobody domestic makes reasonably sized sedans any more, and our only good electric vehicle maker turned out to be run by a fascist, why would you ever buy an American vehicle?
Sounds like the pragmatic thing is to buy a Chinese electric vehicle at half the price of an American vehicle and it will last twice as long. So now the narrative begins to keep them banned, just like they did to Tiktok and Huawei phones.
No, but it is in the 2024 iPad Pro.
Fairphone 4 with PostmarketOS?
Unfortunately, even Debian stable will eventually roll to 590 sometime over its lifecycle.
Either disable the NVIDIA GPU and stick with Intel only, or switch to FreeBSD. It has very good support for old NVIDIA drivers thanks to architectural decisions that were made 25+ years ago.
Maybe eventually the open source "nova" driver will save those of us who want to stay on Linux.