Tl;Dr they all failed because they're init daemons and not entire system management daemons. Article gave a nice description of the different choices but I gave up reading after runit because the reason for failure always boiled down to
It's only an init daemon
Honestly I feel like that's very common with Linux. If you're willing to deal with the growing pain of switching it ends up working out better in the end, some people just don't want to deal with that or it's their job and they can't afford to deal with that. I'm sympathetic to the latter case, less to the former but that's just my opinion
I do wonder how they're going to even try to enforce this. VPNs aren't exactly blockable without a great firewall type apparatus. If they block major providers then you can just setup your own, and if they block VPN protocols outright then it ranges from ineffective to outright destroying the internet. I just don't really get how this is going to work practically. Which is good... hopefully it doesn't pass though.
As someone who mostly avoids JavaScript, I don't see the IT in this image, I just see a bad language I avoid!
At this point why use Ubuntu?
Acts like SVN and CVS didn't exist
The first thing I noticed is there's no IPv6 on this website, just like the real thing -_-
I'm both IT and development...and I've caught both sides being utterly wrong because they're only familiar with one and not the other
Should probably fix that given we've been out of IPv4 for over a decade now and v6 is only becoming more widely deployed
I really wish more projects would use .hpp to differentiate from C headers. It's really annoying to have a single header extension blend across two incompatible languages.
As a fan of tabs I see this as an absolute win
Honestly, I get this is a joke...but it unironically wouldn't impact me, I run single stack v6, so let's do it. I'll grab some popcorn