Was he worried about the kid or his network lol?
Why must everyone be removing OVPN ๐
Probably also depends on what country you're coming in from. I have virtually no social media presence myself but when I came back to the US I didn't even have to speak to CBP, they had an automated facial scanning system and just required you to be holding your passport. This is as a citizen, I'm sure the process for foreigners is less lax.
I'm not sure if that's true. The mint team has their X-Apps project which is designed to be a cross DE GTK app initiative. Having written GTK software I also haven't found many pain points myself. Most of the problems with gnome seem to be the gnome team and not the surrounding projects.
๐ค the black hair girl looks familiar, can't place her though
It isn't really future proofing, it's becoming increasingly important now. IANA exhausted their v4 supply in 2011, most RIRs followed shortly after. I believe Africa is the only region left with available IPv4 addresses. Depending on where you live and how big your ISP is even having a v4 address is iffy. A lot of smaller ISPs already put customers behind a double NAT. NATs in general add latency to connections and make inbound connections difficult. A good dual stack network typically has lower v6 latency. There are also several popular server hosts that charge extra for IPv4 connectivity because of the increasing scarcity. An IPv4 address on AWS is more expensive than their cheapest server offering for example. This means using APIs for v4 only services can add an uncesscary cost burden to consumers of the API depending on their needs. Ultimately it's not important for this website because it's a joke but it's important for anything serious.
Keep in mind that back in 1980 when IPv4 was introduced there were more people than IP addresses. Even in 1980 it was impossible for every person to get just a single address. For the job IPv4 was given of connecting the world it actually failed out of the gate from a certain perspective. IPv4 was never adequate for the task we gave it and over time it's only become less adequate. It's a tad silly that v6 was introduced in 1995 and is still the "protocol of the future."
Anyway, rant over, see this nifty website, they provide shame as a service lol. https://whynoipv6.com/
Sounds like a feature to me
Ooohh nice. That's a beast of a system. Although mine isn't a slouch it doesn't quite compare to that. I have a 7950X, 10TB of total NVMe but with raid it's only 5TB, 64GB of ram...and my 5700 XT.
Damn, nice. That's the card I keep telling myself I should upgrade to. I have a 5700 XT and I really like it but I kinda want something newer with more power
I've thought sublinks was really cool, a lot of which because it's Java and I feel like modern Java doesn't get the love it deserves...but I am worried about it not being AGPL. At least for me the fact that Lemmy couldn't have it's codebase closed was a large appeal and this move doesn't sit well since it would allow instances to close source their backeds if they wanted to. I feel like AGPL is a requirement for user freedom with websites as it's the only open source license for the web.
Discussions like this always bring me back to one thing...can a word itself be racist? Is it racist to use a word if it's not being said with racist intent? It's reminiscent of the gimp debacle...if a words use isn't intended to offend it's honestly beyond me how anyone could find it offensive. Are we supposed to ban every single word that has the slightest history of being used in an offensive fashion? Feel like we'd have a really long list if we did that.
Scoopta
0 post score0 comment score
Reading the README on the GitHub is amazing. I love the energy of this project if nothing else