I'd be interested to see where that number comes from because im fully sceptical of their ability to determine that.

Sure, but they'd only regulate the recording of cops

There are several reasons to put actual people in to space.

They might be reasons you think worth it, but they do exist.

If you saw harassment in that first exchange then whatever you mean by "you people" is a group I’m fine with being in.

That's some thin skin.

Real question, what if there is no cognitive dissonance.

Like someone who knows exactly what's going on and says "fuck it, it's delicious" ?

Ah the tried and tested "it's ok if it's my property" which historically(and currently) is a universal guideline for what is and isn't ok.

Didn’t robin williams have some other thing going on that gave him some sort of super depression.

edit: Yep, Lewy Body Dementia

That assumes that enjoyment is the only metric, which is common, but not universal.

Some people can think the movie is of high quality, but the subject matter isn't for them, as an example.

Think of it like food:

Good food: the food you enjoy

Bad food: the food you don’t

Unless you're basing good and bad on how "healthy" the food is (for whatever given metric of health you want to use)

It's interesting as a subject but I dislike this as a presentation format.

This is the video equivalent of "this meeting could have been an email".

Also his voice and cadence are irritating, but I recognise that that's a personal gripe. Certainly an "old man shouts at cloud" moment but coked up youtuber energy isn't my jam.

I'm tempted to say Abed from community (the TV show) the representation could be considered subjectively accurate.

The social situations are a bit contrived though, given it's focus as a comedy, so it may not be useful as a representation of real life interactions.

Indeed, the paradox of tolerance is real https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance

At least for me and by the sounds of it, you.