ShepherdPie

joined 9 months ago

So they only seized 4 websites and not 100?

Hyundai said models built at its new GA plant would be eligible for a $3,750 tax credit.

Once it begins building batteries at the plant, Hyundai expects new IONIQ 5 models to qualify for the full $7,500.

From the article linked inside this one about the 2025 Ioniq 5

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

My wife's Edge had a faulty backup camera too, but Ford didn't issue a recall, so I had to shell out hundreds of dollars for a new one and install it myself.

They also have defective ABS modules that corrode when in contact with brake fluid. They did issue a recall for it with the Fusion and MKX but not the Edge. Hers lost complete braking pressure while driving because the ABS valves stick open and bypass the line going to the brake calipers. Luckily, she didn't crash, but once again, I had to shell out $800 to get a new one and spent two days replacing it myself.

Counterpoint is that this recall can be done OTA instead of requiring you to make an appointment and visit a dealership which is a million times more convenient. Your car has had recalls too.

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

*parking brake not emergency brake. Most of these ratchet down and wouldn't be very useful in an emergency since they'd just cause your rear wheels to lock up and lose traction.

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There's still side mirrors, no? If you've ever seen a semi, those are 60 feet long, weigh 80,000lbs and back up without a rear view mirror or backup camera. Acting like this is an issue that's going to kill people is a bit absurd.

These look like the little flying sensor balls from Twister.

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Easy access to Elizabeth Oliveira Hair Xtensions withThe Dools London. Totally worth the asking price just for that if you ask me!

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

For the fourteenth time, it's completely irrelevant to the discussion.

You talk about conveniently ignoring things while you're ignoring the whole topic so you can keep talking about some updates to Fallout '76 as if that has any bearing on Bethesda trending toward doing worse and worse with each new release. You're making a completely separate argument to the rest of us.

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 1 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Is that my "line of thinking" when I never said anything of the sort? I don't think so.

I've never played Cyberpunk 2077 nor No Man's Sky and have zero opinion on them, but you bringing them up out of nowhere as some sort of 'gotcha' screams "my argument is based on emotion and not fact."

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

So Bethesda is good because Starfield might be worth playing 10 years after it was released? You're obviously not understanding the point here.

It doesn't matter that they improved '76 after the fact. It matters that they keep releasing top dollar garbage that needs years of work after the fact to even be playable.

Like imagine if you bought a brand new car that broke down immediately after you drove it off the lot. You take it back to them and they tell you "We understand you're disappointed, so if we get time we'll fix it for you and should have it back to you in a year or two." Are you going to be satisfied with no car and no money for that long? Does it really make it better if they do actually fix it at some undetermined point in the future?

view more: next ›