[-] SmartmanApps@programming.dev -2 points 8 months ago

Here is math for kids

Yep, that's about The Distributive Property too ๐Ÿ™„ Every time Multiplication gets mentioned, you know they're talking about the Property, since the Law has no multiplication in it, but The Distributive Property of Multiplication over Addition does

Distributive law means you are allowed to distribute

No, the Property does. The Law tells you that you literally must Distribute.

not that you must distribute

Because The Law says that, hence why it's a Law ๐Ÿ™„

Iโ€™m so sorry for the amount of effort youโ€™re futilely putting into this lmao

says someone who can't even tell the difference between the Property and the Law ๐Ÿ˜‚

Nowhere in all your sources and screenshots is it stated you must distribute

Yes it does liar

thus the entire argument breaks down

Not for people who know how to read ๐Ÿ˜‚

[-] SmartmanApps@programming.dev -2 points 8 months ago

Open a textbook

I've been telling you to do that the whole time and you still refuse ๐Ÿ˜‚

Tell them, not me

Tell them you refuse to open a Maths textbook? ๐Ÿ˜‚

[-] SmartmanApps@programming.dev -2 points 8 months ago

addressing the actual point (how those facts fit together)

I did address the actual point - see Maths textbooks

all youโ€™ve done is confuse yourself

I'm not confused at all. I'm the one who knows the difference between Distribution and Multiplication.

what I was saying

You lied about there being no such thing as "the Distribution step" (Brackets), proven wrong by the textbooks

make arguments that donโ€™t address it.

Textbooks talking about The Distributive Law totally addresses your lie that no such step exists.

Never mind that some of those micro-rebuttals arenโ€™t even correct

You think Maths textbooks aren't correct?? ๐Ÿ˜‚

[-] SmartmanApps@programming.dev -2 points 8 months ago

Tell them, not me

You're the one commenting without reading Maths textbooks

[-] SmartmanApps@programming.dev -2 points 8 months ago

Take it up with them if you have a problem with them

I see you're not even reading what I said. No wonder you don't know how to do Maths...

[-] SmartmanApps@programming.dev -2 points 8 months ago

Take it up with Berkeley

Says person refusing to look in Maths textbooks ๐Ÿ˜‚

[-] SmartmanApps@programming.dev -2 points 8 months ago

Again, if you have a problem with Wikipedia, take it up with Wikipedia

You've made the mistake of thinking they care. Again, look for Rick Norwood in the Talk sections, an actual Maths professor (bless him for continually trying to get them to correct the mistakes though)

[-] SmartmanApps@programming.dev -2 points 8 months ago

who needs math anyway?

Lots of people

If the president can claim medicine prices will go down 1200%

Did you miss seeing all the people who know Maths ridiculing him?

[-] SmartmanApps@programming.dev -2 points 8 months ago

2+5 is 8

In which you just did Addition before Brackets, and is thus wrong

8-5 is 3

5(8-5) is 15

8ร—3

There is no 8x3. 2+5(8-5)=2+15=17

[-] SmartmanApps@programming.dev -2 points 2 years ago

But, but, must downvote things. Need things to downvote! Dooooooooownvooooooote. ๐Ÿ˜‚

[-] SmartmanApps@programming.dev -2 points 2 years ago

youโ€™re just a tutor and not actually a teacher?

Both - see the problem with the logic you use?

Let me know when you decide to consult a textbook about this.

[-] SmartmanApps@programming.dev -2 points 2 years ago

are reacting from their gut

As was the person who wrote the article. Did you not notice the complete lack of Maths textbooks in it?

view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ

SmartmanApps

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF