Smith6826

It's echo-chamber, culture-war nonsense. There's a reason men are the vast majority of physical jobs, and it's not because anyone is stopping qualified women from working.

Just as an example, in my personal experience, we rarely received women's applications to work warehouse or roofing, and even less who met the qualifications of being able to pick up minimum 50lbs (not that heavy, approximately 2x 24's of beer) on their own.

I'd also like to point out that, while I'm not trying to minimize her impressive achievements, your friend is from modern society, not ancient. She had the privilege of going to school, being a cheerleader and having free time, instead of cranking out babies in the ancient wilderness.

Tasks based on sex were not so prevalent until high cultures formed...

Like being pregnant and giving birth (as many times as possible), breastfeeding, and raising those same infants while the men are doing tasks that are unfeasible for pregnant breastfeeding women taking care of infants?, like hunting, building shelters and going to war, among other things? (Which some women did, but the majority did not)

Oh, ya ya, for sure. A lot of people in this thread seem to be sharing the same anti-anthropology delusion. Which is very concerning but not surprising in the age of misinformation. More culture-war BS.

Did women also hunt? Yes.

"As much as men"?

No, beyond any shadow of doubt. Stop trying to white wash over history and verifiable evidence to try and push your personal agenda of stoking culture-wars.

Unless we're talking about tribes where the men took care of the children, the above statement is exaggerated at best and borders on anti-history/anti-anthropology nonsense at worst.

You might as well post that the men spent as much time taking care of the children than the women. And if you can admit that is false for the majority of human history, then you can clearly see how this being false also disqualifies the "women spent as much time hunting" statement.

Again, there is no debate on the fact that many women were great hunters and not just gatherers, but you also can't deny that most of the women took care of the kids.

Looks like I took the bait, didn't I...smh lol

This is widespread and has been ongoing for almost a decade now, when reddit started turning hard towards fascism and censorship. Just like reddit, some of the larger communities here have been infiltrated and ran by controlled opposition fascists.

In fact, the reason the last mod gave for banning me from PoliticalMemes without a warning was suggesting they were controlled opposition, since they were making very pro-fascist arguments, but trying (and failing) to portray themselves as left wing.

Check out my first few comments on this account for a direct example of .world admins and mods on PoliticalMemes in this case, banning for "calling people fascist". First immediate ban from the community without warning, then they pushed for an instance-wide ban that .world admins gladly obliged.

Wait, so this isn't real? Everything's so goddamn crazy I can't tell anymore.

Though typing it out gets us banned from the larger, compromised communities...smh.

Some fascist mods on compromised subreddits and lemmy communites are banning people just for calling out fascists/fascism now. How ironically ass-backwards is that? Lol

"If you say fascist people and actions are fascist, we will censor and eliminate you!"

Whatever you choose, don't rule out using chatGPT to help with coding. You still have to review every line to make sure it's not gibberish if asking to generate code, but in general, it saves countless hours and will absolutely become a valued asset to your team.

What would be the most profitable path in terms of learning and, if possible, generate a modest income?

GPT might have some insights for you there as well.

I've seen someone with 0 coding knowledge make a functional, albeit rudementary, first-person shooter on PC, only using chatGPT.

That will only be when we The People start doing something about it.

Wake me up when the rest of the masses have the balls to go on a general strike to halt the economy until our demands of basic human rights are met.

The majority of people are still too comfortable, stupid, weak, afraid, brainwashed, and complacent to do anything at all, let alone something that would actually make a real impact.

The moment all of us peasants collectively go on strike is the moment the government and billionaires start losing. Simple.

But again, generally, people are too selfish to share others' suffering even if it ment a better world for everyone.

And that is the peaceful option that the masses are too complicit to even try...

If accidentally doubling up on their prescription ADHD meds causes someone to overdose (with no additional factors), then they have a grossly incompetent doctor.

All it takes is a student to proofread their paper to make sure it's not complete nonsense. The bare minimum a cheating student should do.

Hello Streisand effect.