Someonelemmy

Even more ironic, he said no one would be swayed by an out of touch billionaire that can't identify with them...

Andrea Botez??

Apparently its the other way around. This tech is old: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2009/jul/19/robots-research

News to me. I loved the game andI really thought the plot was original.

JFC, I'm so glad we spent all that blood and treasure to end up with this...

A quick check of old news makes it sound like LGBT rights were a lot better under Saddam: https://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/pressreleases/stories/2009/06_june/30/saddam.shtml

Well now I just D.A.R.E. the cops to stay off drugs. Just say "no", you hypocritical bastards

That's encouraging. Just when I thought nothing would come of the protests. Now to see if the vote actually pass a motion to divest.

🤢

Ahhh, I'm just a warm, toasty cinnamon bun...

"The package is also running headlong into the schedule in the Senate, which is expected to begin the impeachment trial of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas on April 11."

OMFG... The priorities.

Ok. So, replace him with who?

I believe it's Tiffany Taylor

I'm not so sure SCOTUS would rule that way. Even Gorsuch ruled in favor of lgbtq rights because it is such obvious discrimination: https://www.npr.org/2020/06/15/863498848/supreme-court-delivers-major-victory-to-lgbtq-employees#:~:text=Gorsuch%20couched%20his%20opinion%20in,or%20transgender%20without%20discriminating%20...