SpicyAnt

joined 9 months ago
[–] SpicyAnt@mander.xyz 57 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Parallelepiped

[–] SpicyAnt@mander.xyz 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I see - thank you for adding that context, I think that this title change is in itself quite interesting... Because then they did intend to use a sensationalist title, and only changed it later.

I have double-checked out of curiosity and I do see that your post's title is the title indexed by google:

I am sorry for jumping into the assumption that you had changed the title yourself.

[–] SpicyAnt@mander.xyz 0 points 9 months ago

Good point - reported

[–] SpicyAnt@mander.xyz 3 points 9 months ago

Exactly! I was worried you wouldn't be able to read in between my lines 😌

[–] SpicyAnt@mander.xyz 1 points 9 months ago

But in all seriousness this is such a huge failure of our media to resort to scaremongering instead of staring the facts.

I agree.

But in this case that is not what is happening.... The linked article does not make the claim that is present in the title of this post at all!

[–] SpicyAnt@mander.xyz 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (11 children)

The actual title of the linked article is: Leaked German military documents laid out a doomsday scenario where Russia wins in Ukraine then invades Europe

The article explicitly states:

The documents are not a prediction but part of worst-case-scenario planning, a common exercise within militaries. A German official called the scenario "extremely unlikely."

So I don't think that the title of this post is fair. Russia could go to war with NATO in 2024, and you don't need a leaked document to tell you that. But there is nothing in this article that makes this possibility seem any more or less likely.

view more: ‹ prev next ›