now we know where to go when the mageddon happens 🤭 . but seriously, well done on the effort and sharing the meals with friends👏 .

i think it's still worth to ban the imports of these recording-glasses. if we need to help the visually-challenged, then make models that doesn't have the recording function.

i think these recording-glasses are different from phone cameras because these glasses are way too discreet (you cant tell when you're being recorded).

awesome!

Good move! And only allow ones that doesnt have function to record (e.g. to help the visually-challenged).

a somewhat alternative view that i find amazing: https://reclaimthenet.org/the-meta-settlement-what-it-means-for-speech-and-privacy. seems Meta is ok with the big $23Billion settlement because it will give them more profit in the future.

the safety of children must be the first consideration.

spot on!

Not every person who possesses or imports a child-like sex doll will go on to become sexually abusive. Current research does not establish a simple causal pathway.

In fact, some scholars found doll owners showed lower arousal to abuse scenarios and lower sexual aggression proclivity than those who didn’t own a doll.

Other studies similarly found doll use was linked to reduced deviant and compulsive sexual behaviour.

I'm finding the above misleading, because the 'studies' linked seems to be about 'adult' sxx toys, not child like sxx toys.

I believe it's quite obvious that there is No positive outcome of those wanting/ owning/ using child like sxx toys. For the sake of the community, they belong behind bars!

the other issue (with Albo's path) is that the under16s are smart enough to get around the age-verifications anyway.. like this one: https://cybersecuritynews.com/fake-moustache-bypasses-age-verification-system/.

yes, you're spot on

as owners of backyard chickens, those look tempting (on behalf of the chickens) hahahahaha :-).

well done!

i recently came across Google's 'family-link' and iphone's 'Screen time'. seems this would be more effective? these aim to lock your child's phone so that they cant install any new app without permission. feature also include only allowing the web-browsers on your child's phone (and phone-wide, i believe) to access websites that you approve of (using a 'white-listing' process).

References: -https://www.bitdefender.com/en-gb/blog/hotforsecurity/family-link-bypass-android-2025 -https://www.techlockdown.com/articles/how-to-put-parental-controls-on-iphone

It's truly worth it to protect young minds from the Internet these days, it's full of crazy (bad) things :-(.