Unless you have a source for that second sentence I’m going to have to call bullshit on that, I’ve read probably 100s of articles on clinical trials and the spread of patients tested is usually close to even gender wise, if not with a very slight female bias, at least in the studies I’ve read. The problem isn’t from a lack of medical knowledge of how women work, it’s from misogynistic shit stain doctors that read these articles but still treat women in such a horrible manner systemically despite the literature being out there.
Its more of a societal problem than a lack of knowledge of how women’s bodies work, but in my opinion that makes these doctors even more horrible people than if it were just a basic lack of knowledge of women’s anatomy, they choose to he terrible people despite the knowledge being easily available to them.
I mean I’m aware of the controversial past in regards to how women weren’t represented in trials but your own link says that they reversed that decision in the 90’s so there has been sufficient time for doctors to learn the differences in biology because the research has been built upon robustly during the last 30 years. So that makes them terrible people for not keeping up with the research was the point of my other comment.