Radical thought, maybe read the article?
V0ldek
joined 10 months ago
If you're hearing this, then there is still hope. Hope that you can avoid making the same mistakes we made.
I see calling like Raegan's margin in 1984 "decisive"
Also, not that it’s the point but I have to note that technically most election victories are decisive, in the sense that they resolve the winner with little to no ambiguity (which is usually the case, even when the margin is narrow). In that sense, the only way Trump’s victory is not decisive is if you contest the legitimacy of the whole election.
This is such pedantry that you might as well say "the Merriam-Webster dictionary defines decisive as..."
Also it isn't? 50.2% to 48.1% of votes is not decisive in any sensible meaning of the word?
If you account for the turnout (around 60%) it means 30% voted for Trump and 28.9% for Harris, so "none of those" won decisively with 40%!
We should harness this and power ChatGPT with it
Audibly rolling my eyes
Always has been.
Ok but how detailed can we get then
Слава Україні. The world has failed you.
I hope at least CPT does not have daylight's savings
You know, you can just click on the link in the article to watch the ad it talks about