Vintor

joined 1 year ago
[–] Vintor@retrolemmy.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ok, here's what is subsidised, assuming you speak German:

https://www.verbraucherzentrale.de/wissen/gesundheit-pflege/krankenversicherung/alle-kassenleistungen-der-zahnmedizin-im-ueberblick-12921

Call that nonsense if you wish, I'm not going to enter into a discussion of that kind.

[–] Vintor@retrolemmy.com 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

That's not at all how it works in Germany, though. Dental treatments are paid, as is medication. There is a surcharge for medication, which is capped at 10 Euros. And some dental options, which are not strictly necessary (debatable in many cases, I'll give you that!) are not included. Physio and optical costs are also included.

Some of the payments require a doctor's prescription in order to be accepted, but I would call that pretty fucking universal.

[–] Vintor@retrolemmy.com 1 points 1 month ago

I pronounce it the same as other people here: “sock-urh”. I was just confused about the “association” thing, so thanks for clearing that up!

[–] Vintor@retrolemmy.com 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I did provide a link where both the British and the American pronunciation treat the c as an s sound. They have the IPA as /əˌsəʊ.siˈeɪ.ʃən/ for both dialects. "soc" does contain the c, not the t.

As I said, I'm not debating that the t in "tion" is pronounced that way (at least I tried to be clear, maybe I muddled it even more), but I have always pronounced the c as an s sound, and it appears Cambridge agrees with me.

[–] Vintor@retrolemmy.com 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

Where is "association" pronounced like that, if I may ask? I could only find the pronunciation I'm familiar with, which is this: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/pronunciation/english/association

To maybe be more clear: you are implying that the c in "soc" is pronounced like a "sh" when it's the t in "tion".

(Edit: missed some letters.)

[–] Vintor@retrolemmy.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Vintor@retrolemmy.com 44 points 2 months ago (3 children)

There are only so many ways to represent the spectrum of light.

[–] Vintor@retrolemmy.com 2 points 2 months ago

Ahh, I see what you mean. Yes, in that regard he was possibly the only true master. I know that this style of layering densities was taught at the time, but I don't think many artists brought it to a comparable level.

[–] Vintor@retrolemmy.com 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Brilliant and very recognisable - but not peerless. Here's Philippe Caza, from 1978: https://lcart1.narod.ru/image/fantasy/philippe_caza/philippe_caza__le_temple_de_la_nuit.jpg

(Edit: typo; 2nd edit: 1978, not 75)

[–] Vintor@retrolemmy.com 5 points 3 months ago

You're absolutely right, but that's the pre-smartphone era, not the pre-cellphone era.

[–] Vintor@retrolemmy.com 19 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Ok, I have an experiment for you. Go touch some really hot chili peppers, then wash you hands. With soap. Three times, if you like. Then rub your eyes. Then tell me that felt absolutely fine. Go ahead, I'll wait.

[–] Vintor@retrolemmy.com 12 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Capsaicin is non-soluble in water and basically doesn't wash off.

view more: next ›