Voidian

joined 9 months ago
[–] Voidian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Because it's usually only incels that think this is the type of conversation anyone wants to have. Touch grass.

[–] Voidian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

There are no universal rules about this... like pretty much everything, depends on who you're talking to and who you want to make a positive impression on.

Excessive amount of Emojis does seem to read as kinda juvenile, tone-deaf and Instagram-marketey to me at least.

[–] Voidian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 3 months ago

Look, sniff, and only then taste if you didn't detect anything. Do it with totally fresh stuff too so you learn what That's supposed to be like.

That's why your mom had "the nose". Learn to use your senses.

[–] Voidian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I assume from the vagueness that the point is that this applies in any situation because the key factor is "your values". Which are personal to you and only you can know them.

[–] Voidian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago

It usually gets complicated. We're at the point where you basically have to decide what level of unethicalness in any system is acceptable to you. Would help if you put that in your OP probably.

[–] Voidian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 3 months ago

I already have a magical rectangle my dumb ass likes to look at already. I don't want another.

5
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by Voidian@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/spirituality@lemmy.world
 

Another post reminded me of this movie trilogy and my gripe with how people at best draw the "the world is a simulation" idea from it. The directors have been clear about the influences of eastern philosophy. Which only gets more personal for them with the subtext of also exploring the experience of being transgender, and how genders are just social agreements with no inherent, fixed reality.

There are pretty pretty heavy hints in the movie (including the last one having an Upanishadic mantra in the soundtrack:

Asato mā sad gamaya (from the unreal, lead me to the real)

Tamaso mā jyotir gamaya (from darkness, lead me to the light)

Mṛtyor mā’mṛtaṃ gamaya (from death, lead me to immortality)

Unpacked here (a bit, but it’ll correct the likely, immediate misconceptions people unfamiliar with eastern philosophy would get)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BoEcSc064YY

The irony is that despite its philosophical depth, The Matrix became shorthand for "what if life is a video game," which to me seems like a convenient escape from the harder questions around how we perform reality, how we cling to narratives as if they’re absolute. The Wachowskis didn’t just reference Eastern thought. They used it to ask, what can you actually truly know to be REAL?

Just wanted soapbox for a bit because I don't wanna lecture in the other thread...

(oh and let's not even get into how incredibly badly the "Red Pill" symbolism got corrupted to be the polar fucking opposite of what it was in the movie...)

[–] Voidian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It’s a great connection. Beyond Descartes, the Wachowskis explicitly cited Buddhist philosophy as a primary influence, specifically the concepts of Maya (illusion) and Samsara (the cycle of suffering which people unfortunately tend to misunderstand a lot).

The "There is no spoon" scene is a direct nod to Sunyata, or emptiness. It suggests that "reality" isn’t just subjective; it lacks inherent existence. In this view, it’s not just the world that is a construct, but the "self" perceiving it as well. Lana Wachowski has also stated that the trilogy was designed as a "meditation" on the nature of choice and the self, influenced by their interest in Eastern philosophy.

There's also an Upanishadic mantra in the third movie soundtrack, appropriately:

Asato mā sad gamaya (from the unreal, lead me to the real)

Tamaso mā jyotir gamaya (from darkness, lead me to the light)

Mṛtyor mā'mṛtaṃ gamaya (from death, lead me to immortality)

Unpacked here (a bit, but it'll correct the likely, immediate misconceptions people unfamiliar with eastern philosophy would get)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BoEcSc064YY

[–] Voidian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 46 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Okay? No. Normal? In the context of that person's life, yes it's normal, else they wouldn't do it.

Being hurt by perceived rejection is normal and valid. Making another person "wrong" for holding a boundary for whatever reason is not valid, though it might be understandable which is NOT the same as excusable.

People need to learn more non-violent communication, and general understanding of boundaries.

[–] Voidian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Some people really can't detect sarcasm without the /s, huh.

[–] Voidian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

Careful. This sounds a lot like encouraging people to take personal responsibility of their consumption habits. That's literally fascism. We need government regulation to stop us from doing things, that's freedom.

Someone might throw the Mr. Gotcha meme at you.

[–] Voidian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

It’s people not being educated anymore to tolerate divergence of opinions and, a lot more worryingly imho, not being able, because of that lack of proper education, to listen to nuanced thoughts and ideas and to be able to understand that we can disagree without having to hate on one another.

What's most worrying to me is that people don't even know why they AGREE with the opinions they agree with. For example, most people would agree that bigotry is bad (which it is), but they don't know how to argue about it.

They’ve got the moral instinct, sure, but zero intellectual grounding. And that’s a problem. Because when people don’t understand why something is wrong, they're just one propaganda push away from accepting a new definition of "bigotry" that serves whoever’s in power.

We’re seeing it happen in real time. People repeat opinions like they’re reciting scripture - no thought, no critique, just blind agreement. And now, even asking people to think critically about why bigotry is wrong is seen as suspect. It's an immediate failure of purity testing. You're not supposed to arrive to the conclusion that bigotry is bad by thinking for yourself, you are just supposed to keep repeating the correct slogans. That’s not just lazy, it’s anti-intellectualism, the exact kind of mental rot that populism and fascism thrive on. That's exactly the kind of bullshit that got USA in the state it is right now.

I have literally been called a fascist for telling people to think for themselves.

 

Anarchy is very cool, until someone has the wrong opinion.

 

I can kinda see it happening on mainstream internet, on YouTube etc. with witless non-nerds but I'm surprised to see it in places that inherently require one to be a tiny bit internet savvy, like Lemmy. I get that getting a bot spam the same message isn't exactly resource intensive but i still wonder if the cost-effort-return ratio is worth it.

 

Give the machines a conscience so they don't get obsessed with narrow goals at our expense. Better than the usual tech-bro nonsense, at least.

Can we actually code "emptiness" and metta into a machine, or is this just more noise?

view more: next ›