Wooster

joined 1 year ago
[–] Wooster@startrek.website 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I would recommend two pins.

One being the season one you’re proposing… and a second for a focal episode to discuss and cycle it out every two days.

So for the first two days we’d focus on the first episode (episodes? It’s a two parter) then the pin would be swapped with the next episode.

This would allow more in depth discussion while acknowledging binge watching.

[–] Wooster@startrek.website 4 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I feel like this is a large portion of the missing puzzle pieces. The difference between real world and advertised ICE stats are somewhat padded, but not significantly. You'd expect the hybrids to have a similar degree of discrepancy, but it's wildly out of range of expectations. It may simply be that the manufacturers are giving idealized stats, since while testing they would have access to their personal charger in a laboratory environment. But in the real world, owners cannot guarantee working/accessable chargers or even that they can charge at home, which would dramatically impact the results of this study.

Or at least, I'd assume that's the case in the US. I don't know what EU's charging infrastructure is like, where the study was preformed.

[–] Wooster@startrek.website 23 points 8 months ago (5 children)

TBH, the most astonishing reveal from the study for me was that Hybrid owners weren’t charging their vehicles. Unfortunately, the why isn’t covered in the study since it seems to just be hard math and statistical analysis.

Are they just not plugging in at night?

Too frustrated with the battery draining too quickly?

Driving too far for the battery to meaningfully contribute between charges?

Is the extra hardware mass making the ICE that much less efficient?

Laziness from having to fill both the battery and the gas tank?

[–] Wooster@startrek.website 19 points 8 months ago

To be fair, I’m really just judging the EC’s article writer. Not the trustworthiness of EC or the study itself.

[–] Wooster@startrek.website 126 points 8 months ago (21 children)

When I saw the headline, I thought this was clickbait, since the headline and the linked article avoided quantifying how much CO2 the vehicles said they consumed vs the real world usage.

Table in Question

If you dig into the cited materials, it turns out it wasn’t hyperbole.

That said, I still consider it extremely poor form to omit the information the study was centering its argument around.

[–] Wooster@startrek.website 3 points 8 months ago

Yes, and I personally would rather avoid paying a premium over the electricity I can get at home. If I intend to stick to that, then I have to be prepared for when Murphy shows his unwelcome face.

[–] Wooster@startrek.website 4 points 8 months ago

Mmm. Did Russia even need to incite it, or just toss gasoline on the flames that are already burning?

[–] Wooster@startrek.website 7 points 8 months ago (3 children)

There are reasonable reasons for wanting a greater range than you expect to use on a regular basis. Not the least of which is a power outage or your own home charger choosing an inopportune moment to kick the bucket, as you are your own gas station manager.

[–] Wooster@startrek.website -1 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Again, my question stands, what if he ignores the monitor and posts bond? What’s preventing him from just doing what he wants?

[–] Wooster@startrek.website 11 points 8 months ago (5 children)

What happens if Trump simply disregards the monitor, and posts bond?

[–] Wooster@startrek.website 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Can’t read the article since it wants me to disable my adblocker, and that ain’t happening.

But, if the campaign is skewing African American women… then why does the billboard for this article depict a white woman?

[–] Wooster@startrek.website 9 points 8 months ago

Just because Trump may be out of the picture, doesn’t mean the folks who watch Fox suddenly disappear into the ether.

view more: ‹ prev next ›