I like Matt Dillyhuntys approach to objective morality: he picks a subjective and kind of arbitrary foundation like wellbeing and objectively measures all actions against this foundation.
Znarf176
joined 1 year ago
Essentially the whole climate change debate centers around the wellbeing of future generations aka "the children". How is this not valid?
I like short intros with only vocals like "Hush" from Stick to your Guns.
Just because it is not comparable to a serial killer does not mean that it's not bad enough to warrant a holier label. How do you justify killing and torturing an animal just for taste pleasure?
What are your reasons for comparing veganism to religion? Aside from having a strong opinion I see no real similarities. To me it feels like non vegans want this comparison to be valid to be able to make it about personal choice when it really is about respecting others.
Also the "there is no right answer" argument is always in favor of the status quo which is factory farming animals. Is that really something you want to preserve?
Maybe you should consider the possibility that some people in some aspects of life really are holier than thou and you could learn from them. Imagine someone pointing out to a serial killer how not killing is more moral and the killer answers with "Holier than thou.". Would this be a good comeback?
ROCK AND STONE TO THE BONE!
Go vegan. It's the single biggest thing you can do. Also if possible get a bike and ditch your car (yes, I know cars are mandatory for a whole lot of people).