As far as I can tell, this applies after reconnecting to the domain controller and being able to pull new credentials. It's not 100% clear in the article, but
Old credentials continue working for RDP—even from brand-new machines.
Even after users change their account password, however, it remains valid for RDP logins indefinitely. In some cases, Wade reported, multiple older passwords will work while newer ones won’t. The result: persistent RDP access that bypasses cloud verification, multifactor authentication, and Conditional Access policies.
While the password change prevents the adversary from logging in to the Microsoft or Azure account, the old password will give an adversary access to the user’s machine through RDP indefinitely.
However
The mechanism that makes all of this possible is credential caching on the hard drive of the local machine. The first time a user logs in using Microsoft or Azure account credentials, RDP will confirm the password's validity online. Windows then stores the credential in a cryptographically secured format on the local machine. From then on, Windows will validate any password entered during an RDP login by comparing it against the locally stored credential, with no online lookup. With that, the revoked password will still give remote access through RDP.
Which makes it sound like it has to be logged in successfully first, directly contradicting the first quote.
Either way, it does appear to be an issue that an online device will accept expired passwords before it will pull new credentials from the inter/intranet
Microsoft 365 Copilot Video Discover
Roku is headquartered in California. If we're prioritizing user friendliness over location (nothing wrong with this!) I'd go with a Google TV box or something like the Google streamer. Since it's Android based you can (with a little bit of a workaround) change the launcher and ditch the ads. With Roku you're stuck with whatever they give you; and they just "accidentally" tested ads on startup before you even see the home screen.
Whoops, I understood the original post as you were looking to replace an existing Garmin. They have other supported brands, I just linked you directly to the Garmin page. Hope it can be of some use!
Gulf of Acrisure
Ah I see the concern there. Fingerprint data isn't handled as much on the software side as it is through the hardware. Android doesn't get access to what's actually scanned, just whether a scan was read and if it matched what the reader was expecting, Scanners are limited to a certain number of entries depending on how much space is available to store fingerprint data, which is why my 256gb phone can only store 4 fingers. It's also why you can't add separate fingers in separate apps, they all use android's API to determine whether a biometric scan was a success or not.
Nothing in the world could get me to click on that link
Absolutely massive babies! Right behind my mom
Huh, didn't know that. Not the most elegant solution though
Never heard of em. They must be good if Sony's trying so hard to block them
Side note, I leaned about Waze in a news report about cops complaining about it.
alphapuggle
0 post score0 comment score
I believe it's built into the Google app by default
com.google.android.googlequicksearchbox