I thought it was a good race. The period while the leaders were stuck behind Hadjar (and lapping backmarkers, if I remember rightly?) was pretty tense. The Piastri collision was such a shame, it would've been great for the race if he'd have been ahead and Norris would've had to overtake on track.
I was shouting at my TV a couple of times. One when Piastri had the collision with the Williams in the picture-in-picture and it didn't get picked up on commentary until the replay. The other was that fact that they showed the coming out of the pits / safety car line before playing the team radio, so the commentators were treating it as "ohh, that was really close!" before realising it was in reference to a possible infringement. Not major things really, but it's a shame when it feels like I know what's going on more than the commentators for a brief period.
Who decides what goes on that list? How do you ensure measurement/enforcement of these rules is accurate and fair? How do you prevent takeover of whatever body manages/enforces this list by people with bad intentions?
I would love it if people who disagreed with my fundamental beliefs weren't allowed to vote too, but I think it's the wrong level to attack the problem. You have to have a political debate and bring people on side instead. Otherwise, why do we have a democracy anyway?