[-] anbu141@scribe.disroot.org 0 points 1 day ago

That is correct; you are absolutely right.

[-] anbu141@scribe.disroot.org -1 points 1 day ago

You are absolutely right, but the situation is clear; no matter how angry you may be, this is not an issue that can be easily resolved. Please reconsider after some time has passed; this situation causes us a great deal of distress as well, and I am truly sorry for what has happened.

[-] anbu141@scribe.disroot.org -1 points 2 days ago

There’s no need to argue; if that’s what you say, then so be it, my friend. I’m not trying to start a debate about which language is "better"—I’m simply pointing out which one is more comprehensive. Anyway, have it your way.

[-] anbu141@scribe.disroot.org 0 points 2 days ago

This is not an advertisement; it is simply a genuine, long-term user experience.

[-] anbu141@scribe.disroot.org -2 points 2 days ago

Let me ask a question, then: why were the Linux kernel and the Linux ecosystem written in C rather than Python? No matter what other language you might consider, nothing can truly take the place of C; if you are a software developer, you should already know this.

[-] anbu141@scribe.disroot.org -2 points 2 days ago

I actually like Rust too, and I’m not against it; however, C is currently the best-known programming language in the world. Still, I like your idea.

[-] anbu141@scribe.disroot.org 1 points 2 days ago

Yes, you are absolutely right. Regardless of how proficient an LLM (large language model) might be at documentation and coding, it remains just that—an LLM. If you write the documentation yourself, you can craft it in a way that is both engaging and humorous. I am not suggesting that we should avoid using LLMs altogether; I simply believe they should be used with moderation.

[-] anbu141@scribe.disroot.org -1 points 2 days ago

People used to say the same things about the Linux kernel, but its current state is actually quite good. In other words, C is a standard and robust language.

[-] anbu141@scribe.disroot.org -3 points 2 days ago

We used to enjoy using Proton, but over time, it began to resemble a large, impersonal corporation. Moves like the introduction of a "workspace" plan or tendencies toward monopolization are clear indicators of this. Switching to Disroot—a far superior alternative—has been invaluable for us; Disroot truly values ​​its users. Although they are experiencing some issues at the moment, it’s not a major concern—every system encounters problems from time to time, and we are fully confident that these will be resolved soon. We highly recommend Disroot as an alternative to Proton; it is, in a word, a fantastic service.

[-] anbu141@scribe.disroot.org 0 points 2 days ago

This could be a great idea; it’s a thousand times better than using LLVM.

view more: next ›

anbu141

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 1 week ago