[-] anzo@programming.dev 5 points 9 months ago

Latin america: I will die because of an injustice

[-] anzo@programming.dev 5 points 11 months ago

"Modern day" Luddite. It's not just using the word isolated! Tittle clearly mixes the meaning with the historical reference. Plus, the one being pedantic were you.. But thanks anyway for pointing out the word has two definitions.

[-] anzo@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

I see that. But where lies the joke exactly? My interpretation is that this white dude barely knows what he's doing, like constantly moving the wood. To me is more like set it up, and watch it burn. Then, from time to time, you add another log.

[-] anzo@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

We have solarpunk's techno-realism though. It's not a political party, that's why many won't see it. But it's definitively there.. like open source projects, hardware, fediverse, and so on.

[-] anzo@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago

I never thought of that, if you get a m3u8 playlist or are able to craft it yourself (and open in, say VLC) then you're done. Jellyfin supports IPTV (those, or any live TV streaming sites)... https://jellyfin.org/docs/general/server/live-tv/

[-] anzo@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago

I said my needs. I was just sharing. Hardly understanding your normal use case of 10-50 users on a same kdbx. The best you could do is having multiple kdbx, fro subgroups of users. Since not everyone should have the master password to all those kdbx... But I am sure that if those were my needs I'd jump to vaultwarden too. That's why I specifically added the disclaimer sentences on my post. I didn't mean to rob vaultwarden of its value. Just pointed out the tradeoff. Your comments adds on to those tradeoffs, they're just different solutions with different pros and cons. The user who mentioned using vaultwarden behind a VPN gave great input, I wasn't considering that. Anyway, have a nice day.

[-] anzo@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago

Those who never tried it (yet)!

[-] anzo@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago

No hurt feelings, no need to apologize! Thanks for sharing ;)

[-] anzo@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago

Same as using any open source app. Actually, less (you're only giving access to some paths, gpus, and listening on a port). You should use 127.0.0.1:xxx:yyy so that it's not attached to all available ip addresses (0.0.0.0 is implicit)

[-] anzo@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago

I voted no, because I couldn't help to think how cool it would be to live on treetops instead!

[-] anzo@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago

Same, it's super simple with Docker and you don't even need to fiddle with ports or anything. I should probably try running it at my work PC now that I think of it.. Anyway, duckduckgo has been good to me for all these years.

[-] anzo@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago

For code, being old is not always bad. Take for example some Unix commands, like copying files between servers using the ssh protocol. That hasn't changed in 50 or more years. So, if there're API endpoints in both apps, setting a cronjob would let you monitor every minute if you're streaming, and then do the switch. Or, even better, you may be able to have a hook/ trigger design pattern. Can you link to the scripts? Have you tested them at all?

view more: ‹ prev next ›

anzo

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 3 years ago
MODERATOR OF