Bubbles go up tho
It also coincides (by a few days?) with GenP moving from reddit to lemmy (dbzer0). They liberate Adobe software.
What are you saying?! Freddy didn't fuck Mercury, but the other people did.
Glad :) while we are at it, here's another web that may come handy: chronotrains.com
I use rsnapshot docker image from Linuxserver. The tool uses rsync incrementally and does rotation/ prunning for you (e.g. keep 10 days, 5 weeks, 8 months, 100 years). I just pointed it to the PostgreSQL data volume. This runs without interruption of service. To restore, I need to convert from WAL files into a dump... So, load an empty PostgreSQL container on any snapshot and run the dump command.
This is great. Good complimentary functionality to ShellCheck (linter).
Indeed, ZFS uses a percentage of RAM for cache. That amount is configurable. ZFS has a easier CLI, I'd recommend it for a NAS. And, allow me to say that I am not sure the comparison is between truenas scale and proxmox really. This thread reminds me of the usual distro wars when people don't know about desktop environments (kde, gnome, xfce, etc.) as in: you can use ZFS in proxmox ;O
Note that this news are important, I only want to give some peace of mind to the many amateurs self-hosting out there ;) Don't panic. Think about how such attacker might gain access. There's always a practical difference between a vulnerability being there and how easily it is exploitable. Most CVEs are theoretical, and combining 4 of them would be even more difficult. From what I read, the vulnerability would be in the Dockerfile itself. Also, you need to weigh in the motivation such attacker would have. If you're an average netizen is different from a multi billion dollar company website. So, the attacker would need to meet all those conditions described in the CVEs and even in that case, they might escape the container only to find it was installed in rootless mode, so they just have access as regular user. But that's depending on how docker was installed.
Most people is wrong, the issue here isn't Climate crisis or Da Vinci being a sexist. It was just a bad soup, too bland.
The most salient difference is that YNHST is tied to Debian, while Runtipi is a set of containers you can install on any distro
anzo
0 post score0 comment score
joined 3 years ago
MODERATOR OF
This! Is the most resilient. It can run on anything, not just LoRa! So, it can work on underlying infra (assuming there's power, e.g. renewables)