apparia

joined 5 months ago
[–] apparia@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

I interpreted it as about like, microprocessor design and nanometer scale electronics and shit. Electrons are basically elves in my book.

[–] apparia@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 1 week ago

From the perspective of this thread they're probably similarly good and "deep". My instinct would be to err away from anything object oriented for beginners since OOP has always felt a little cultish to me and I think it's maybe something "shallow" (at least shallower than plain C) that has a habit of masquerading as the one true "deep" way to do programming.

C also has the practical advantage of being fucking everywhere.

Rust

I like Rust, but beyond the subset that is "ugly C" -- using unsafe everywhere and eschewing like 90% of std -- it's definitely shallow.

[–] apparia@discuss.tchncs.de 29 points 1 week ago

"Responsible disclosure" is a term of art, I think that's why they use the word there.

[–] apparia@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Great article. I've always been of the opinion that C should be one of, if not the, first things taught to programmers. You can explain Python in terms of C, but you can't explain C in terms of Python.

[–] apparia@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Why is "AI" being replaced with "Al" (lowercase L) in your post titles? Something to do with subverting scrapers? I've seen a few of these posts and it trips me up; in the typeface I'm using it's quite distinct.

[–] apparia@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 weeks ago

Yes, those things should go without saying. But this seems directed at a previous "modern terminal emulator" (or maybe there were a few?) that did the rounds a while back and did require an account.

For my part the more damning bit is this:

if RAM usage is of importance, consider [other terminals]

IMO not a great selling point for any utility and particularly not one I'm liable to have tens of concurrent instances of. I'll stick with foot.

[–] apparia@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 3 months ago

Sure, but the gif doesn't show 50 knots. The gif doesn't show any speed actually, so I really don't know where the 50 number comes from. But on the tracker the speed was 8.1 knots. Fast for a tanker, but totally believable.

[–] apparia@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 3 months ago

The gif shows no data (dimmed icon) from 08:49 UTC to 11:10 UTC so I had my maths wrong and it's 2 hours 21 minutes, apologies. Still a lot more than 30 minutes. The AIS data also generally comes in less frequently than every minute so there's some unreliability there.

As I said, according to the current data the ship definitely kept going back up towards the Strait since I posted, so what's more likely, it kept going on its current course and spoofed its AIS for nearly 12 hours, or that it turned around?

[–] apparia@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

My source is marinetraffic.com. Other AIS trackers also corroborate it.

From the sounds of it the OP and most other articles are based on similar armchair research looking at trackers so I think it's about as reliable as we're going to get.

[–] apparia@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

I don't know where you're getting any of that from. It was travelling at 8 knots before and after the turnaround. The bit in the animation where it slows and drifts almost due south is actually marinetraffic not having AIS data for that period so it just interpolates between the two known positions. Maybe I should have made that clearer.

That turnaround period is also close to ~~3.5~~ (edit: 2.5) hours, not 30 minutes.

According to the same data the ship is now close to the Strait of Hormuz that it passed through yesterday; it seems pretty clear it did not get where it wanted to go.

[–] apparia@discuss.tchncs.de 81 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (31 children)

Everyone is reporting on these ships making it through the strait which is still under Iranian control. Few seem to mention the part in the Gulf of Oman where the US is actually implementing its blockade. The poster child, Rich Starry, mentioned in the article, did this a few hours after clearing the strait, still far from the Arabian Sea:

Marine tracker timelapse showing RICH STARRY travelling southeast out of the Strait of Hormuz, halting and showing stale data for around 3.5 hours, and then returning back the way it came at speed.

That sure doesn't look like a ship breaching a blockade without incident.

It's too early to say how this will play out on a larger scale but for these specific ships a lot of reporting is really fucking misleading at the moment.

[–] apparia@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Thanks! Looks like that 180's showing on my noob free tier now too. Pretty much the same thing Elpis did; through the strait itself no problems but then a sudden 180 in the Gulf right about the same place as Starry. Elpis came to a standstill almost immediately after but Starry is allegedly still doing 8.1 kn, strange.

 

I have never had a LinkedIn account, both out of general anti-data-vacuuming-social-media, and specifically anti-whatever-the-fucking-corphead-psychos-are-doing-on-LinkedIn tendencies, and managed to find a decent job out of uni just fine (software field). I'm now looking for a job again and the number one piece of advice I'm being given by concerned parties is "get on LinkedIn".

I'm curious how many people into the whole "privacy" thing have had to make this choice, and which way you went with it.

Do the advantages (which it seems mainly boil down to "networking") outweigh the icky feeling I'd get making an account? Of course only I can actually answer that question, but it sums up my conundrum.

view more: next ›