axont

joined 4 years ago
[–] axont@hexbear.net 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

All of these dorks are just auditioning for jobs in the Trump administration. They refuse to say anything bad about Trump even though they're running in a race against him.

Except none of them will get jobs because Trump thinks they're all dorks.

[–] axont@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'll put it like this:

The external imperialism of western countries far outweighs the danger, threat, and damage to human life than even the most cartoonish and absurd claims about the alleged internal authoritarianism in countries like Cuba, China, and the DPRK. It's such a massive disconnect and it's also not even a dialectical comparison.

The external imperialism of western nations is precisely what generates the security apparatuses that are developed within modern socialist countries. Most of the time what you regard as gross and needless authoritarianism is in fact socialist states defending themselves from external aggression. Go listen to Parenti talking about the measures Nicaragua had to take in regards to capitalist encirclement.

And furthermore, the decision to not use the term authoritarian to describe western nations constantly confuses me. Is it because the term imperialism is more accurate? If you want my gut feeling on this: authoritarian, totalitarian, and related terms were all cooked up by liberal historians like Hannah Arendt to make the USSR sound like the same type of thing as Nazi Germany, which is frankly Holocaust trivialization.

[–] axont@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Yeah they do fit the definition, because the distinction between external and international policy you're making is arbitrary and meaningless. I'm a communist. My nation is the working class.

[–] axont@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

If invasions, sanctions, assassinations, and complete immiseration of other nations isn't authoritarian then what is it? Why are we arbitrarily deciding there's a distinction with how a country's internal and external policies? These things inform one another. If a nation like America is doing far worse things than authoritarianism, except externally, why can't we say that's what it is?

Obviously killing people externally or internally is bad, but it's more shocking in the same way that a parent murders their own child.

That makes no sense. Joseph Biden is not my dad and my shared nationality with him means nothing because he represents an economic class at war with my own. Was Hitler the father of German Jews? What the fuck are you talking about

[–] axont@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago (5 children)

You are however disregarding how a nation conducts itself internationally, instead focusing entirely on domestic policy. Should we not consider how a nation acts towards people outside of its own borders as this authoritarianism? If we include a country's imperialism, you'll find the overwhelmingly most violent, brutal and authoritarian nations are the USA, the EU, and the west in general.

[–] axont@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Ok, but if that's the case, why are we drawing a line at a nation's internal population and disregarding their external policies? The USA killed three million people in the War in Iraq, including Iraqis who were very critical of the American presence. The USA has assassinated Latin American presidents for speaking out against the USA and replaced them with more America-friendly dictators. And yet everyone who talks about authoritarianism doesn't include western nations in their discussion, they instead make up a cartoon idea of what countries outside the west are like. Your definition of what is or isn't tankie/authoritarian has some kind of nationalist bias built into it.

Every time someone describes what authoritarianism is, it makes me think that America and the EU are the worst perpetrators of this behavior, but they mainly export all their violence rather than use the worst of it domestically. Domestically they use private sector means to distribute violence, such as poverty, prisons, and the facilitation of ambient racism.

This reminds me of the dividing line that liberals use, which is when they say things like "that dictator killed HIS OWN PEOPLE." As if killing people externally is more excusable crime?

[–] axont@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago

Something like half of Chinese people use a VPN and the state censoring western sites Facebook and Twitter is a good thing

[–] axont@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah you got it. American white bourgeois society is a virus. And you're right, all the unique music that came out of the USA is a product of oppressed minorities. Even pasty white conservative country music is a perverse mockery of southern/appalachian folk music that has roots in African and Celtic traditions. The banjo is an African instrument for instance.

White suburbs are a genuine blight and their expansion is cooking the planet.

[–] axont@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago

Trip could squeeze an extra warp speed out of an engine by wrapping the coils in baling wire then spitting on it

[–] axont@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago (4 children)

At-will worker here. One time I got fired for not remembering my boss's son's birthday (a son who I had never met and was also 6 years old)

[–] axont@hexbear.net 45 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

I neither love America nor the government. Our culture is a disease, our cities need to be razed or entirely redesigned, and our land needs to be returned to natives, to Mexico, and to the descendants of slaves.

Our entire society is a covenant with death and an agreement with hell.

[–] axont@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago

They can taste protein in a different way than we can though.

view more: next ›