172

Also reported by George Takei on his socials.

30

RIP to a TNG/VOY/ENT alumnus.

58

RIP Apollo.

21
42

Paramount Max, here we (eventually) come. Unless this whole financial house of cards implodes first, of course.

46

Clear as mud, where the timeline thing is concerned.

63

RIP Quinn (and a Hunter on DS9).

30

I thought Ira Behr's and Anton Mount's comments were interesting.

[-] billmason@startrek.website 12 points 1 month ago

Well now we need to re-remaster that episode, obviously.

[-] billmason@startrek.website 10 points 1 month ago

I will always reserve judgment until seeing it (taking the hypothetical stance that this actually gets made), but it's not an exciting description of a Star Trek project (to me).

30

This is kind of offbeat, but if you're on a Mac it's fun to have After Dark back. And as soon as I discovered I could use this app to download the After Dark Star Trek edition from Internet Archive and have it running on my Mac, this was a must-have.

26

A bit of a list, some of which has been previously announced.

19

For me at least, the only interesting thing in here is that contrary to prior reports, the SNW sets have not been destroyed (but are disassembled and in storage somewhere).

[-] billmason@startrek.website 11 points 2 months ago

I'm sorry but no. Of all the "and it didn't happen/gets reset at the end" episodes of Star Trek -- possibly of all of television -- that was the biggest waste of time I've ever subjected myself to.

21

Brief Star Trek mention if you don't want to read the whole (lengthy) thing.

DEADLINE: What is your plan for the Star Trek franchise? It is at crossroads with Strange New Worlds and Starfleet Academy ending and no new series greenlit. If I heard you correctly, you said that something is coming. Yes?

WISEMAN: Well, it’s one of the reasons why Chris is here as the resident number one fan of the Star Trek franchise. And there’s so many people in this building, by the way, that are. It is our goal and it is our job to figure out what the next bounce of Star Trek is. We’re talking to a lot of writers, we are leaning on CBS Studios, and it is imperative that we figure out what the next iteration is in this franchise because it’s just too important. We also are in touch with Paramount Pictures, they have a Star Trek movie that’s in development.

[-] billmason@startrek.website 16 points 7 months ago

Here's the first (big FWIW/grain of salt/etc) thing on the decision that's I've seen (besides the TrekMovie article note that 'it's no secret that the show didn't Nielsen chart'). From author Mike Chen on Bluesky.

From the few insiders I know, viewership was actually above expectations and this was more of a "future of the franchise" corporate decision. I'm expecting Trek to be in flux as there are SO MANY variables. Everything from tech stocks to Iran to midterms is impacting Paramount.

Leaving the link to his post here for reference but he has his posts hidden unless you're logged into Bluesky.

[-] billmason@startrek.website 24 points 7 months ago

Random reactions:

  • Disappointed but not surprised.
  • Even though the article leaves this an open question, I will be surprised if Kurtzman returns after this.
  • At least they didn't memory hole S2 as a tax write off.
  • I wonder if they will attempt (and be allowed to attempt) to rework the S2 'cliffhanger-ish/lite' ending into something else, or if it's just impractical to rework a "part 1 of 2" episode into a 1 episode contained story.
[-] billmason@startrek.website 13 points 7 months ago

Oh shit, that was fun. I hate having to wait now. Also, the end credits are sublime and must be paused and read in their entirely. This is non-negotiable.

[-] billmason@startrek.website 10 points 8 months ago

Quieter episode but I enjoyed it. I wasn't expecting a Genesis story this season from what's been said, but I was glad to get one.

[-] billmason@startrek.website 9 points 8 months ago

I hadn't heard that, other than they got his blessing basically (and the licensing) and he was given a copy of the script to read. Cirroc Lofton seems to be the one that was as close to hands-on involved as you can get when you're not a writer of the script.

[-] billmason@startrek.website 18 points 8 months ago

Presumably it's a combination of "thank you for what you contributed to Star Trek" and maybe a way to acknowledge him letting them license the final scene narration off of an album he did some 20 years ago.

[-] billmason@startrek.website 9 points 8 months ago

I'm just replaying the last 30 seconds over and over again and punching my feels into oblivion.

[-] billmason@startrek.website 9 points 9 months ago

If you haven't been, at least try this episode (or everything up to this episode if you want to go all-in). If this episode doesn't move you in some way, then I don't know. Maybe it's not actually a show for you.

[-] billmason@startrek.website 16 points 9 months ago

Loved the episode, no notes.

view more: next ›

billmason

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 9 months ago