[-] bitfucker@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No, the cat on the left has visibly bigger body and somehow that makes me chuckle

[-] bitfucker@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

We need to develop darling too

[-] bitfucker@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

Did you not disable the unneeded plugins on a project? I wouldn't turn on the rust plugins for a js project if the codebase doesn't have it

[-] bitfucker@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

Isn't it to keep the copyright notice and not the license itself? I.e, you may redistribute it with a different license term and conditions but the copyright notice must be retained. I don't know how different it is tho in legal speak. Maybe they are equivalent.

[-] bitfucker@programming.dev 4 points 2 years ago

The spirits are pretty violent today

[-] bitfucker@programming.dev 4 points 2 years ago

The one that passes could be the next shot and OP is too panicked to hear the second bang.

[-] bitfucker@programming.dev 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Anonymized is still risky as people speech has a pattern. All it takes is one nutjob to dox and now everyone has a problem.

Edit to add further information why anonymization is hard. US survey and statistics data is jittered in a random way to protect the privacy since it is possible to backtrack the statistics to the person who answers the survey. I think it was explained in a minutephysics video.

That is a whole government department dealing with sensitive data and mathematical proof that their survey result is anonymous. What can a law firm do to guarantee anonymization? Remember, guarantee is a strong word here as it carries legal implication for the firm. If the firm cannot guarantee anonymization, then the company would not want to be liable when shit hits the fan.

[-] bitfucker@programming.dev 4 points 2 years ago

Why... why is it more secure? Does it mean AI training is actively abusing copyright law? And this is more secure because they can hide it better?

[-] bitfucker@programming.dev 4 points 2 years ago

Boy do I wonder what it will do with ADHD people

[-] bitfucker@programming.dev 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I don't use windows so I don't know the specifics. If microsoft is INFORMING the user beforehand about this change (that copilot switch/policy is now available) AND DISCLOSE that in the future if you didn't touch this switch then copilot may be installed, sure, blame admin. Otherwise, this is a shitty move from software update POV

To add: Maybe you can link the change log provided by microsoft before this update that adds those switches or rules to prove that it has indeed been disclosed to the admin.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

bitfucker

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago