[-] bitfucker@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago

Yeah, that's my point ma dude. The current LLM tasks are ill suited for programming, the only reason it works is sheer coincidence (alright, maybe not sheer coincidence, I know its all statistics and so on). The better approach to make LLM for programming is a model that can transform/"translate" a natural language that humans use to AST, the language that computers use but still close to human language. But the problem is that to do such tasks, LLM needs to actually have an understanding of concepts from the natural language which is debatable at best.

[-] bitfucker@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago

Yeah, for sure since programming is also a language. But IMHO, for a machine learning model the best way to approach it is not as a natural language but rather as its AST/machine representation and not the text token. That way the model not only understands the token pattern but also the structure since most programming languages are well defined.

[-] bitfucker@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago

Yeah exactly why I said that it is my opinion. But it is not just for PCB assembly, a mechanical assembly too if you only have the mechanical drawings will be quite hard to edit. To me, the ability to easily modify and redistribute something is what makes it open source. If you can only replicate something without the right to modify it then it is just source available.

[-] bitfucker@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago

For hardware, there is a difference between knowing the schematics and actually editing the schematics. You can have all the schematics you want, but when you try to modify it to suit your needs you need to either remake the schematic or if the original file is shared, edit that instead. As I said, this is my opinion and the ease of modification is generally also part of open source. For a simple part, yes it is possible to remake it. But a complex assembly requires significant effort. Say a roller needs to be spaced a certain amount. You may want to tweak those distances. Before you manufacture it, you check what parts need to be changed to accommodate for your modification too.

[-] bitfucker@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago

Yeah, I am not having issues with battery life so I do not tweak my power settings. The mouse works in wired or bluetooth too, just the dongle is a bit problematic

[-] bitfucker@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago

No. I have a bog standard ASUS UX325UA_UM325UA laptop running arch+kde. I have not tweaked with power saving at all (only adding hibernate)

[-] bitfucker@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago

...not sure if my curiosity is worth the terrible day that I'll have after knowing what may come.next

[-] bitfucker@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Haha thanks, I am usually hesitant to link directly to MD outside of the anime/manga community

[-] bitfucker@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago

Sure is, the usual at mangadex

[-] bitfucker@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago

It would be weird for say, a 12V-2A PSU to not be able to source and sink 2A. The current direction didn't change from the PSU perspective, only from the load. If you have multi-rail power supply, then yeah it may have different source-sink capabilities for different rail

[-] bitfucker@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago

To be fair, he could also just be fed up after a long time being ignored for what he thinks is quite an important design decision.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

bitfucker

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago