Thanks a lot. One follow up tho if I may. How do you determine the markup and styling if the layout changes significantly from browser to desktop? Do you ship 2 different versions of the HTML and style them accordingly? My struggle is often about how to make the HTML and CSS so I don't repeat anything if possible. One example is having a list of navigation links in HTML once should be enough and show correctly on desktop and mobile via CSS only. But that is how a lot of UI frameworks usually do it. They have 2 different navigation markup. One for mobile as a drawer and one for desktop as a navbar. Only one is active at a time. The navigation link list is usually defined as a JS object but I don't feel like that's the way to do it properly.
Damn, what's the movie name again? With Tom Cruise cloned and all?
Edit: It was oblivion
Honestly, the wave of system integrator and people making SFF build to compete with steam machine already puts steam at the advantage. They already released SteamOS for every other desktop, that means system integrator and pre built can also make SFF with console like experience
Yes it is a variant but also it's more general than that. If you sold the same item with a different number of pcs in a pack (even if just a plastic packing), it also gets SKU. In general you can't break SKU into smaller units without making a different SKU.
So if you sell socks in 1, 3, and 5 pairs, all get their own SKU even if every pair of socks in the bundle are the same kind. That means if someone wants to order 1 pcs but you only have SKU for 3 in your system, they can't. Even if the item is there physically. Not unless you remove the SKU of the 3 bundle and add 3 of the 1 (which requires the buyer to communicate it and the seller to jump a bunch of hoops on their system)
SKU is stock keeping unit. So not really about variant pf a product but every unique sellable items should have it's own SKU so you don't accidentally sell 5 of things with one color while only have 3 in stock.
It also helps me that are apparently IP block banned by a lot of places
I would've asked why arch pre bundles it but then remember other arch based distro exists
Or maybe don't use AUR blindly? You're doing the equivalent of `sudo curl
| bash`. Who knows what the script is doing. So only do it if you truly trust it. That's why we have warnings plastered all over. That's also why a warning label and sticker exists. And this is precisely the reason easy no user input AUR helpers are greatly discouraged
HTML5 is a beast of a spec. Like, if properly used it is enough to make a functional UI with modal and tooltips and whatnot. This is what makes it popular for not just "web" application IMHO because you then no longer need to learn yet another DSL for UI (electron, react native, capacitor js, expo)
Lmao, those Easeus are so out of left field. Can I have The Sims 3 if it is on steam please? If it is not for steam then it's fine. Someone else may want it
Because if I say CAD then it would include KiCAD which is rock solid already and IMHO is perfect for most SME too
bitfucker
0 post score0 comment score
I ask the inverse. Why should you demand that every project that uses x.y.z versioning be a semver? A widely held standard only applies if you actually want to follow it in the first place. You know HTTP spec didn't mention anything about the body in GET requests and so almost every web server just ignores body on GET? Yeah, some software decided to use that. And guess what? That software? It was Elasticsearch. People are free to do whatever they want with their software. If they decided to publish something non standard and you decided to use it, you can ask them nicely to follow standard, or make an adapter for it.