[-] brian@programming.dev 8 points 4 months ago

vaultwarden is already reasonably mature for server

[-] brian@programming.dev 8 points 2 years ago

I can't imagine a sandbox would help. what can an an extension do that doesn't touch some arbitrary code that gets run? it could add a line to the middle of a giant file right before you run and remove it immediately after. even if you run the whole editor in a sandbox you do eventually deploy that code somewhere, it can change something inconspicuous like a url in a dependency file that might not get caught in a pr

the only solution is to audit everything you install, know all the code you run, etc. ofc that's not reasonable, but idk what else there is. better automated virus check things maybe? identity verification for extension publishers? idk if there's an actual solution

[-] brian@programming.dev 8 points 2 years ago

that doesn't sound right, it's so much smaller if it's just one line

[-] brian@programming.dev 8 points 2 years ago

the pueue plugin isn't perfect but it covered all my uses at least

[-] brian@programming.dev 8 points 2 years ago

you realize they're more than just your picture on a screen, right? there's a whole public key private key verification process that happens, which covers your photo and personal info, at least from what I understand of ISO 18013-5.

if anything it should be almost impossible to make a fake mobile id, barring exploits in reader software or the govt leaking their private key.

[-] brian@programming.dev 8 points 2 years ago

I assume that's just the actual vegetable, Google translate says that's correct

[-] brian@programming.dev 8 points 2 years ago

I think the difference is that variable is the entire population of coupled adults. Of course not 60% of all couples met online, but I'd believe 60% of couples that met this year met online.

[-] brian@programming.dev 7 points 2 years ago

not portable or self contained, but homeassistant handles things like this quite well. you'd need it running somewhere else though. worth the effort if you plan to automate more things though

[-] brian@programming.dev 8 points 2 years ago

only sort of.

this is the original document defining markdown, and you'll notice it doesn't really specify a lot of the things that have compatibility issues across different markdown processors, along with allowing arbitrary html which really depends on where you're showing it. There's a list of ambiguous syntax here.

CommonMark is as close to a standard as we have.

[-] brian@programming.dev 8 points 2 years ago

Google messages. Here is the support article on the tradeoffs: https://support.google.com/fi/answer/6188337

[-] brian@programming.dev 8 points 2 years ago

mine works for my personal google account, work one is sso and doesn't have it enabled. otherwise gh, aws, auh0 support it, I'm forgetting some others I use. beyond that you can generate 2fa codes too

[-] brian@programming.dev 7 points 2 years ago

canonical has had it's run with the latter two, at least briefly. it's not out of the picture at least

view more: ‹ prev next ›

brian

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 3 years ago