We are publishing libraries (mostly client libraries). There are lots of legacy stuff. It's safer to own the whole feed instead of pushing it to nuget.org and hoping for the best :)
Strange. Thanks for checking.
I believe there is already a browser add on for this. Cannot remember the name right now.
Edit: I think this should be in Lemmy core.
It highlights all the elements in your password. You need to find their atomic numbers. And then add other elements to add it up to 200. If you search for "atomic number 100" duckduckgo will give you Fermium (Fm), for example.
Thanks for the explanation and the links. It's good to hear that there are people working towards this goal.
I'm not trying to say "bigger is better." The point I'm trying to make is: if a bot starts flooding lemmy communities with myriad of links, then it will be more difficult for a smaller community to make sense of it. There will be lots of communities that has many links without comments. It will start looking like a dead village. So, it would be better if only the real interesting stuff (with high ratings) are brought in. That way, fediverse communities would have a better place to start from.
I mostly agree, but there is a risk of overwhelming the new and relatively small communities of fediverse with a lot of links without any comments/discussion. Is there a way to filter the content according to their reddit ratings. That would help fetching more interesting stuff.
I keep seeing IBM documentation more and more in the search results. But due to its slowness I always thought of it as something old and outdated. Maybe I should pay more attention to it.
With Structurizr, you get a site where you can click around to see different levels of the system and different views of of containers, components, etc. Is that also possible with the PlantUML library? Or do you only use it to document one part of the system independent of others? I kind of like the possibility to have the whole system in a single place so that if I change the name of component, it's updated everywhere, but I don't like that it's its own thing separate from the wiki et al.
I have been using Mermaid for some time. I really like it since there are many systems that support Mermaid syntax. But it's a general tool and doesn't have the benefits of a "framework" Will give Structrz (Lite) a shot, but not being able to embed is an issue.
I wonder if there would be some interest in looking into DDD (Domain Driven Design) here. I intend to study the topic and wouldn't mind some company. I can also serve as the mod, if that's a necessity.
URL style name: ddd
Display name: Domain Driven Design
I take full responsibility for this. I thought this was a parody. I didn't think anybody in their right mind would actually use this. In my defense their page contains of fake product reviews. Anyway... It's probably best to remove this, I'm perhaps mistaken. Thanks for the warning.