driftWood

joined 1 year ago
[–] driftWood@infosec.pub 2 points 3 months ago

Woah! Thanks for taking the time to write the detailed response. Will take a look at the source code. Really appreciate the effort ❤️

[–] driftWood@infosec.pub 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

I added more comments on the original post which describes the situation a bit more.

Don't know what's a good way to get the comments linked to this post.

Do take a look if you are interested.

[–] driftWood@infosec.pub 2 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Standards are set of rules. But still different vendors implement them separately. For e.g. TCP/IP stack implementation is a bit different in Windows and Linux but end user generally never realises this because it's close enough that things still work. I want to know what is the sequence of events when Linux creates a Response packet for a ping Request it received.

 

Reposting here since want to know how a Linux computer handles this scenario.

[–] driftWood@infosec.pub 17 points 6 months ago
[–] driftWood@infosec.pub 7 points 7 months ago

This weirdly makes sense to me. Not long ago would have done the same.

[–] driftWood@infosec.pub 1 points 8 months ago

Not really. Just has to run till at least 5years at least. Since this will be deployed at customer site, pine64 and android both are not feasible. Thanks for the suggestion though.

[–] driftWood@infosec.pub 1 points 8 months ago

Thanks. Will take a look.

[–] driftWood@infosec.pub 2 points 8 months ago

I have one in the lab at office. Were abt to be thrown out. Nursed it back to life somehow. Good to play around plus company foots the electricity bill so win-win.

[–] driftWood@infosec.pub 1 points 8 months ago

Agreed. This is for customer site. At home i would do the same thing on a PI.

[–] driftWood@infosec.pub 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I know. I felt while writing the post that this feels wrong writing those words in same sentence. The scenario is that we would deploy the hardware on customer premises so it has to be supported and very reliable(hence enterprise grade). But i personally think that all enterprise grade hardware is way overkill for running ansible playbooks. So was trying to see if there is an intersection point between these opposite requirements.

[–] driftWood@infosec.pub 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Thanks for these suggestions. Will look into them. Hopefully they are still manufactured and supported by the vendors.

[–] driftWood@infosec.pub 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

So this will be deployed for customer sites. I dont think they will be happy with second hand stuff from ebay 😀 For my personal stuff i would have been happy with that though.

 

Basically what it says in the title. I did a lot of searching in Internet. I think small form factor computers are mt best bet. But I still feel they are costly for my purpose.

I am going to be running some ansible playbooks periodically on the machine. SBCs i looked at either had very high specs for this use case and thus higher price or they had other fratures i dont want like - wifi, graphics card etc.

I am preferring enterprise hardware because this would eventually be used in business where people will not settle for anything less.

13
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by driftWood@infosec.pub to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
 

I have started trying out xcp-ng as an alternative to VMWare solutions for virtualization. Currently I have setup 3 VMs of xcp-ng v8.2.1. I have also setup Xen Orxhestra build from source.

I wanted to try out XOSTOR solution for shared storage. I have followed instructions mentioned in the forum: https://xcp-ng.org/forum/topic/5361/xostor-hyperconvergence-preview

I am getting errors at the storage creation step which is step 4 in the forum post I linked. The error I get is "Missing python module 'linstor'."

Anyone has got xcp-ng working with XOSTOR here?

view more: next ›