dsilverz

joined 1 year ago
[–] dsilverz@calckey.world 2 points 2 months ago

@m_f@discuss.online @thefarside@sh.itjust.works

This comic has music... Why do I hear boss music? ("...But what's this that I can't see with ice cold hands, taking hold on me?")

Luckily for the rest of the bystanders, Death is quite fond of the pizza in Chicago. Unlucky day for this guy's cardiac muscle, though...

Scene from Supernatural TV series S05E21, depicting a man who literally stumbled upon Death, moments before falling dead.

[–] dsilverz@calckey.world -4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

@skarn@discuss.tchncs.de @Solumbran@lemmy.world @linux@lemmy.ml

Have you considered the possibility that, by "finding a bug" and possibly "suggesting" a "patch", the LLM could be smuggling another bug unbeknownst to the vibe coder(s) and/or smuggling a technical debt?

I say this as someone who've been coding since my 8s (now I'm 30), someone who hasn't the tribalistic anti-AI sentiment (I even use LLMs sometimes, particularly the non-Western ones such as Deepseek and Qwen) but understands LLMs enough to know how the (current, state-of-the-art) stochastic parrots shouldn't be trusted the source code of any slightly serious project, especially a full browser that Firefox is. Chances are devs are going to blindly trust and obediently stage-and-commit whatever the parroting machine spits out, and this can end up really messy. Given the ongoing pivot to AI from Mozilla, I doubt they're worried about the consequences of vibe coding, though.

[–] dsilverz@calckey.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

@dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works TIL Philipp Mainländer, David Benatar and countless other competent philosophers were/are all teenagers doing teenager ramblings!

[–] dsilverz@calckey.world 13 points 2 months ago (4 children)

@ennof@feddit.org @LuminousLuddite@lemmy.world @technology@lemmy.world

As if it were a matter of caring or wanting/not wanting to use websites... It would be really nice to live in such a world where one could have the luxury of "choosing". Unfortunately, it's not this world for many people and many peoples.

To exemplify this, there are websites I, as a Brazilian, can't simply choose whether to use or not, because there are government and bureau websites for services through which I'm expected to comply with citizen things I didn't ask for (as I didn't ask to be born in this world to begin with). Online services such as "DETRAN" (state-wise transportation bureaus where one must renew one's driver's license), which I remember having to click a reCAPTCHA in order to proceed with transportation-related citizen duties. I can't have the luxury of saying "you know what, I'm not renewing my driver's license which has become my ID for a plethora of services not even related to driving, which means I'm going ID-less and becoming a legally-indigent person in the eyes of the next cop that requests my ID".

Hell, I can't even choose to have a degoogled phone because our customs (Receita Federal) will likely deny the entry for any "unlicensed device" (i.e. devices not licensed by ANATEL, Brazilian telecommunication agency). And installing a custom ROM in any available device is not without the risk of bricking the device (and losing a monthly minimum wage worth of money spent with said device) especially for someone like me who never installed custom ROMs.

Again, would be really awesome to live in the world you described where one could afford "caring to use" things...

[–] dsilverz@calckey.world 2 points 2 months ago

@Grimy@lemmy.world @a_gee_dizzle@lemmy.ca

"Some free advice? You ever get back there, you hoard toilet paper. You understand me? Hoard it. Hoard it like it's made of gold. 'Cause it is." (Chuck Shurley, Supernatural TV series, S05E04)

[–] dsilverz@calckey.world 1 points 3 months ago

@maya_the_good_apple@sh.itjust.works @artshare@lemmy.world

This is very interesting, I liked the slight roughness of the shadows.

I often notice this difference between the techniques of different artists: art is usually born from tracing the outlines of the form (as you did in Image 1), which eventually gets a fill color (as per Image 2). For me, on the other hand, the form is born through base filling, maybe because of the medium (a digital canvas, where a brush stroke can be digitally erased or pruned without leaving traces as it happens on physical canvas/paper). With this kind of drawing technique, depth occlusion and/or the interplay between light and shadow end up being part of the draft itself.

Not sure which software app you use for drawing, but if advice is welcomed, two things help me doing 2.5D depth in my art: a set of water brushes which acts as a synthetic paint (it slightly smudges and blends colors while mixing a wave-like texture according to the current flow percentage; the brush in question is for Sketchbook, but there are likely similar brushes/modes for alternative drawing softwares/apps); layers (dozens of layers) and their blending modes (esp. "multiply" and "linear burn") and the blur filter. I often do posing and anatomy from my visual thoughts, but I also do rotoscoping (drawing over a reference picture) of real photos and/or from dummy/mannequin posing tools; in latter case, the reference comes with depth of its own, which I try to reproduce with the brush.

maybe the shadows weren’t as harsh as i expected them to look

I'd say it has partly to do with the background. Your image (esp. the Image 3) is a transparent PNG, your canvas was likely gray or white, but then you posted to Lemmy, whose UI has a dark background, so the different background ends up changing how our eyes perceive the light-shadow interplay.

[–] dsilverz@calckey.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

@X@piefed.world @anon6789@lemmy.world
TIL the Tytonidae (barn owls) do the same "one-leg perching" that of Athene cunicularia (burrowing owls). Lol

[–] dsilverz@calckey.world 1 points 3 months ago

@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works @artshare@lemmy.world

This, with an additional caveat: it must be two (or more pairs, always an even number of) rings sandwiched on top of each other inside the so there's counterbalancing of the torque, otherwise it'd be more of a reaction wheel.

To be fair, most sci-fi shows seem to struggle with accurate mechanisms for gravity inside the ship, which is directly related to the ship's size and shape... Which reminds me of how the ship from the Vogons (Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy) is, by far, the most unrealistic one, essentially being a gigantic cube inside of which the Vogons stand as they use loudspeakers (from the vacuum of the space) to announce their bureaucratic destruction procedures for Earth 😂

Still, I'd say USS Enterprise is the most iconic spaceship to me.

[–] dsilverz@calckey.world 1 points 3 months ago

@CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world @artshare@lemmy.world

Back when I initially drew, I was thinking of some premises, including ionic thrusters (whose acceleration is knowingly slow) used only for changing the ship's course which would essentially be wandering naturally (and unhurriedly) towards deep space, after being built in orbit (much akin to how ISS was built) then towed to orbit near escape velocities by detachable stages before leveraging gravitational assist, like the Voyagers did. In this sense, the centrifuge would be used during free roam through deep space, when the ship isn't accelerating on its own. Also, the crew would be small (up to a dozen, but ideally three or five people, or an odd numbers of people), which would be floating in microgravity inside the rest of the ship (esp. the cockpit) most of the time.

But thinking about your design, rings around the ship instead of ships above/below the ship, yours is a better design than mine, because it'd also include a more efficient connection hallway to/from the rest of the ship.

I tried to draw it, keeping the pair of counterbalancing rings:

A drawing of a similar spaceship as my previous drawing, in similar view (isometric, 60 degrees) but it's just the drawing and the force vectors on top of it, and the ship now has a different configuration for the rings, in which the wings are actually surrounding the ship's body, rotating in the same axis as the ship's roll axis, although one ring rotates to opposite direction that of the other ring. The purple light from ionic thrusters is slightly improved, with me using a glow brush from Sketchbook to make the ink additive (therefore closer to a light) rather than subtractive. The three astronauts aren't visible through the cockpit's windows.

[–] dsilverz@calckey.world 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

@Adderbox76@lemmy.ca @artshare@lemmy.world

You're astronauts would be puking 24/7

Lol

the rings are way too small

Indeed, the scale in which I depicted the idea isn't accurate and, in reality, the whole thing should be way bigger, which means the astronauts would be barely visible from outside the cockpit's windows.

At least in a mental model, if these models had larger dimensions than they're currently implied to have, the spaceship's body/hull would end up heavier than the rings, even when the rings are also scaled up, because the volume and the surface of the hull is implied/expected to exceed those of the rings, whose materials should be "truss-like" (i.e. hollow) for these to be lighter than the ship's hull.

But, welp, it's been a long while since I tinkered with Kerbal Space Program.

[–] dsilverz@calckey.world 2 points 3 months ago

@SGforce@lemmy.ca @artshare@lemmy.world

Lol! Indeed. I guess that, in order for these configurations (especially the Option B, given potential imbalance on pitch and roll in Option A) to work, the ship must be really big. In reality, the three astronauts inside the cockpit shall be way smaller (but, then, they would be barely visible as subpixels in a 1440x1440 canvas)

 

Putting the ART in ARTificial gravity

This is both an artistic experiment with engineering and a social experiment, given how my usual kind of art (occult symbolism, owls, etc) may feel too complicated for many and it's often met with indifference. Yeah, aerospace engineering is also complicated (after all, it's literally "rocket science"), but it feels to me like this kind of subject (hard sci-fi, Star Trek, etc) is more "socially sanctioned" in Fediverse than my usual kind of subject...

Given the latest happening involving my time-lapses (which I've been trying to post as a proof of human authorship), this time I'm not posting it. I do have the time-lapse for this art, if anyone is interested in seeing how I drew.

Alt-text:

A schematics-like digital art entitled "Artificial gravity for space travel: schematics for torque counterbalancing inspired on real helicopters that have no tail rotors", divided in two panels.

Both panels feature a isometric view of a faintly translucent spacecraft with a gray hull and front-facing cockpit (whose window shows 3 people inside, one of them upside-down weeee-ing in microgravity behind the other 2) very similar in shape to the NASA's Space Shuttle (I actually thought of it as I drew), but with a pair of big ionic thrusters (emitting a strong purple glow) at the rear, as well as a pair of large rotating rings attached to the top of the hull, meant as a centrifuge for artificial gravity. The rings, rotating in opposite directions so to cancel out a torque that would otherwise inflict attitude onto the ship (as per Newton's 3rd Law), are attached through 3 equidistant I-beams to a smaller cylinder (which doubles as a hallway from/to the rest of the ship) which, in turn, is attached to the husk, in different configurations across the panels.

The first panel, "option A: vertically stacked opposing wheels", is self-descriptive: the rings are on top of each other, rotating in opposite directions in the same axis, much akin to coaxial-rotor helicopters (e.g. Sikorsky S-69).

The second, "option B: paired opposing wheels", features a configuration akin to transverse-rotor helicopters (e.g. Landgraf H-2), but with a wingspan slightly angled backwards. Each ring is attached to opposite wings.

At the bottom, there's a label box, describing the meaning of each arrow overlaying both diagrams: cyan arrows represent both the thrust for the ship and rotation for the rings, while blue arrows indicate the gravitational force from the centrifugal motion. A third overlay, painted in magenta, shows the locations for hatches and corridors connecting the inside of each centrifuge to the cockpit and the rest of the ship.

There's also a jab at Star Trek: "Because USS Enterprise is so out of touch with real physics", nodding at how Spock and his crew were "simply" able to stand inside the ship as if gravity was something taken for granted outside a planet.

@artshare@lemmy.world

 

Time-lapse: pareidolia as a tool for face drawing

Warning: the video contains some flashing lights. Do not watch if you have epilepsy.

This one is less about the art and more about the technique. This time-lapse is a demo of how I draw seemingly-convincing anatomy from scratch with no visual aid other than my own "instinctive" sense of pareidolia (i.e. whatever's going on in my own fusiform gyrus), so it may serve as a guide for those who draw faces.

There are a lot of techniques for drawing anatomically-convincing faces. One involves plotting some geometrical shapes using compass and straightedge in order to have a visual reference for facial proportions.

But, then, the human brain has this funny ability to see faces where ain't none. And the "uncanny valley" allows us to feel whenever a seemingly-human face isn't that human.

This mechanism usually goes this way: we see a visual pattern that triggers our "it's a face" perception, then the more specialized facial recognition mechanism kicks in, only for it to perceive how this "face" have some unexpected details (e.g. glowing irises, sharper canine teeth, etc) and/or proportions (almond-shaped eyes larger than expected), so it gets uncanny.

One can leverage it by going the reverse way: crafting an external visual pattern until it maximizes this perception, fine-tuning it for either uncanniness and/or accurateness, depending on the intended goal.

This explains the main flow going on in my mind as I'm drawing a face fully from scratch (i.e. no rotoscoping). I often start by drawing a pair of circles (meant as either eyeballs or eye sockets) to trigger my initial notion of size, then (inspired by owls) I draw the eyebrow ridge going from the silhouette for the nose slightly below the median point, then the forehead, then the mouth cavity, then the cheeks (meant to have some blushing), and the zygomatic relief, and chin, and then... well, it'll depend on the how the drawing is triggering my fusiform girus. You can see me getting back quite often to previously-drawn details as I fix these to better adjust my current perception, sometimes redoing things from scratch. I try to draw the hair as soon as I can, because it's one of the main references for this specific face.

The final shading ended up a bit "flatter" than I originally wanted to draw. I have a previously-drawn "mugshot art" where the shading ended up imbued with better 3d depth, but I didn't record a time-lapse for it, so I made another drawing.

That's pretty much everything for this post, feel free to ask if you got any questions...

Alt-text: a time-lapse disclosing the drawing of a feminine face (meant to depict Lilith, with large almond-shaped eyes, long red hair, expressive eyelashes, soft-yet-sharp chin, blushed cheeks and tender red lips with sharp fangs), seen in close mugshot. The drawing starts from a gray shape akin to a Venetian mask, then it gradually evolves into a feminine portrait.

@artshare@lemmy.world

 

Time-lapse: the surreal encounter between two owls

Warning: the video contains some flashing lights. Do not watch if you have epilepsy.

In the New World West,
with its prairies full with mounds,
She governs the gates to the undergrounds
where She laid Her nest:
as the Sun raises cluelessly,
She raises majestically.

In the Ancient Near East,
where the Sun already fled and hid,
She who rules over the Levantine arid,
where even the pharaohs become Her feast:
nothing escapes Her grips
as She raises to Her highest trips.

A meeting of the two is unlikely to be seen:
not just because of the ocean in-between,
but also the desert and the greens:
two thrones for two Owl-Queens.

Took me 3 and a half hours for me to draw this artistic attempt at putting two overly-specific (and largely disparate) owls species (with which I've been hyper-fixated lately) together within the same, surreal scene: Athene cunicularia (burrowing-owl) and Bubo ascalaphus (Pharaoh eagle-owl).

I guess it's so far the most complex art whose time-lapse I managed to record (luckily, my phone didn't crash during the drawing).

Alt-text for the final art (to be posted as a reply):

Artistic depiction of two owls unusually sitting at different simultaneous biomes while facing each other.

The leftmost A. cunicularia stands next to the entrance of a burrow. She is seen in profile, turned rightwards as she looks at the Pharaoh eagle-owl with a scheming and defiant expression.

The rightmost B. ascalaphus is perched on a boulder roughly at the same distance from the viewer (so the disparate sizes is evident). She's also seen in profile, but turned leftwards, as she looks at the burrowing-owl with a purposefully ambiguous expression (open mouth as if screeching, body slightly leaned forwards with ruffled plumage, visibly hard grip onto the surface of the boulder, wide but half-closed eyes, traits that can be either a defense-attack, dominance pose; or simply the clumsy attempt from an innately strong owl to greet a smaller owl).

The leftmost biome is dominated by grass and other vegetation alongside the burrow, all covered in shadows by dense trees at the horizon. The rightmost is an open, plain desert, with some scattered pebbles and rocks, alongside the boulder where the Pharaoh eagle-owl is perched. The biomes meet almost seamlessly, with a somewhat gradual transition between grass and sand.

The dusk sky is dominated by a large, red crescent Moon, while the Sun is barely visible setting below the horizon.

Alt-text for the time-lapse:

A time-lapse disclosing the drawing processes behind the aforementioned art: from a black canvas to the initial landscape, with the multiplication of the layers containing the pebbles, then the Moon, then the approximated rotoscoping of two real photos of both owls, then a few final touches for texture and shading.

@artshare@lemmy.world

 

Bubo ascalaphus and the wanderer man

"The Pharaohess, the Great Queen... She guides me through this endless desert, She knows every corner of it. She's the only presence in this entire desert and I owe Her my submission and devotion. Uhoo? Uhoo!"

---

Alt-text: a digital drawing depicting a bearded man, seen in profile, walking across an endless desert, while an owl (meant to be a Bubo ascalaphus, Pharaoh eagle-owl, a large-sized owl native to deserts, with deep orange eyes, prominent ear tufts and strong physiognomy) is perched on his neck. The man, wearing marine purple trousers and marine blue shirt, walks barefooted over the sand with some difficulty, seemingly weary, while he looks downward at his hands, which are extended next to his waistline with the palms facing up as if he were carrying something on his hands (but there's nothing being held). The owl, in contrast, is chillingly calm and simultaneously focused, asserting dominance over the man as she looks at his face with the same focused (and majestic) look that of when owls are watching a prey. Her head is slightly tilted leftwards (in relation to them; to us viewers, it's towards us), adding to an uncanny tenderness. Behind them, a deep red sky typical of late dusk blends with the sand at the horizon, while an enormous red crescent moon emits a deep red glow, a glow of which is the source of light for the entire scene (shadows are cast on the ground).

---

Originally, my drawing involved a bit of blood (where the owl's claws meet the man's neck because, in fact, it's something quite expected if an eagle-owl were to perch onto someone's neck with all her mighty, as her claws seem very sharp, more so than other owl genera) and the man only wore trousers (no nudity because there's not even a detailed chest, but the lack of a shirt may be seen/understood as so), so I made a more family-friendly version (no blood and he's wearing a proper shirt) in order to make it fully NSFW-free. The original version can be seen in my PixelFed gallery.

Also, I wanted to have a time-lapse of my drawing, just like I recorded for the previous drawing (Athene cunicularia, burrowing owl) I posted here. However, drawings such as this one tend to be more complex (this drawing has 33 layers, some of which use composition modes such as "linear burn" and "glow", which uses a bit more GPU; in comparison, my Athene cunicularia drawing involved just 13 layers and no composition mode), making my phone more prone to hiccuping/hanging/crashing during my drawing sessions (and recording a time-lapse is, itself, additional GPU load alongside the load from the drawing app).

@artshare@lemmy.world

 

Time-lapse: drawing of a burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia)

I'm used to draw dark and occultism-related art, but my earlier attempts on sharing my artworks on Fediverse (which includes this community) ended up invisible/hidden, perhaps due to how I flagged these as "sensitive content" (so these ended up hidden even for myself because I don't use Lemmy as my Fediverse platform).

Now, I've drawn something more "family friendly" (albeit still heavily symbolic, at least to me): it's meant to be a burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia). Partly because it's a species with with I'm quite fascinated, partly because I can't help but notice how human artistic corpora often overlooks this specific species and genus of owls.

Any image Web search and/or artistic depictions of "owl" mostly revolves around the "ideal owl", the kind of owl many people can visually think of, which often have heart-shaped faces (a trait from Tytonidae family, aka barn-owls) and/or horn-like ears/tufts (common for owls such as those from Bubo genus aka horned/eagle-owls)... however, none of these famous "owl traits" occur on Athene genus.

Nesting behavior and size is also among the trait differences: the Athene cunicularia, specifically, nest on burrows (either dug by themselves or dug by other animals), and the genus as a whole are pretty small compared to other genera, measuring 23cm on average (some other genera of small owls are Micrathene, to which the elf owl belongs, and Glaucidium, to which the pygmy owl belongs).

Niche and over-specific knowledge, indeed, but when art is a phenomenal window to the noumenal, the signified made signifier, knowing about the signifier is important, at least IMHO.

Anyways, it's an(other) attempt of drawing this specific species from scratch. I used "PENUP" app to draw it, recording the time-lapse from within there. As I'm used to draw using Sketchbook, it may not have the same quality observed from my other drawings, because color palettes, brushes and features differ across both apps.

(Trivia: as I sometimes do across my posts, there's a hidden message above, hence why the paragraphs may sound "odd"...)

@artshare@lemmy.world

 

Today is Human's Day

Today is Love's Day, and Friendship's Day, because it's Happiness Day and Peace Day. Also Humans's Day. And World's Day. It's Social Connection's Day, and Earning a Living's Day, also it's Job Market's Day, and HR's Day.

Also, it's Self-care Enoughness's Day, "It'll Pass" Day, "I Feel You" Day, "You Life Matters" Day, "Keep Trying" Day and "You'll Find Someone" Day, because it's also Mental Health Professionals Day, and Mental Health Institutions Day.

Oh, let's not forget, it's also Future's Day, and Hopefulness's Day. It's Narnia's Day, Oz's Day and Wonderland's Day. Last but not the least, it's Life's Day, because it's Existence's Day, Reality Day, which some are used to simplify beneath the umbrella of Demiurge's Day.

I certainly forgot other holidays associated with this very day, because too many things belong to Fool's Day.

Happy You's Day and Me's Day, because you're a lie and we're both fool!

"Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. Fool me cluelessly, shame on both, because we're both fools being puppeteered by the Demiurge, the master of fools."

@justpost@lemmy.world

 

Does Internet still care looking onto steganographed/enciphered data?

As far as I remember the old Web, riddles and puzzles were quite common, everywhere from old social media and bulletin boards to blogs and their webrings.

Y'all may remember things such as Cicada 3301 and that 11b x 1371 cryptic YouTube video; of course, unless you're not a millennial or zennial as I am.

How could these puzzles and riddles, useful for learning a plethora of things such as Math and ciphers and steganography, messages hiding in plain sight, are seemingly gone, nowhere to be found across the so-called modern Web of nowadays?

You're currently facing one of those puzzles, except I'm just another dust in the wind so, to which extent it's still a thing nowadays?

---

Letting aside any attempt to fit a text into a steganography (it's not easy to decipher a hidden message, but it's definitely harder to craft one; yes, both the title and the previous text conceal three hidden messages), what truly happened, what is happening? It's been a while since I stopped seeing and spotting such puzzles and riddles online.

I expected to find it the most across Fediverse and Geminispace, said to be places where humans are supposed to enjoy content with layers of depth and meaning... but, since I've been wandering around, even long-form content without hidden messages seems to be met with (seems like humans can't trust lengthy texts such as this one, believing it's AI-generated), as I observe my attempts on "being the change I crave for" being met with this... void... from the cold Web of nowadays.

Given how Web is essentially defined by human users (although Dead Internet has been a thing for some time), does this have something to do with the collective tiredness going on in the world, with humans too tired to try and focus on reading beyond the visible portion of a text they see online?

Perhaps it's just the online analogous manifestation of "Dark Forest Hypothesis" (i.e. there are humans who'd engage with said content, but they're hidden and keeping absolute silence, afraid of the possibility I'd be one of the ones they're hiding from)?

Perhaps I've been just an unemployed and pedantic guy in a world where humans are too busy with mundaneness so they can't afford the time to deal with all the effort required to read online content (textual or artistic) with all the depth it requires?

Or is it just my neurodivergence being unable to find meaningful connection with this neurotypical world?

Maybe the concept and practice of "hidden messages" are somehow associated with evil things or groups of people so humans refrain from dealing with something which would (in their minds) be potentially "dangerous" or "illegal"? (I once asked about the recent deactivation of the global live feed from mastodon.social and I got a reply explicitly conflating my interest in digitally-guided spiritual gnosis with "unsafe content", two things completely unrelated).

@asklemmy@lemmy.world

 

Existence can't help but rely on itself to be proven

Any proof of existence is, categorically, detached from any scientific rigor, questionable by its own.

Beyond any ontological evidence, how could it be sustained, except through the ontology itself, ultimately speaking?

Yeah, as far as scientific inquiry goes, all it's known somehow infers this supposed validity of existence, empiricism as certainty of existence.

Skeptical by nature, of course Science must have some kind of skepticism about existence itself; this doubt can indeed be found, expressed as hypotheses such as the zero-energy universe.

Such an idea, still a matter of disagreement, hypothesizes about how universe would actually add up to nothing: net-zero sum non-existent existence.

---

This was originally a stream-of-consciousness which I restructured as a more, purposefully cryptic and poetic text... speaking of which, you may want to tinker with the initial letters from each of the four individual clauses for each stanza of the text... (Sometimes the true message isn't what can be seen: it's the unseen)

@justpost@lemmy.world

 

You're being watched

How curious is it that the birdwatcher, the one who watches, is, in fact, the one being watched themselves? For whenever you watch the abyss, the abyss watches you back: she's watching, watching the one who watches her.

Source: Bay Nature, photography by Martin Nicolaus.

Alt-text: a photography of a burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia) perched behind something out-of-focus, which is occluding her from being fully seen. Only the top of her head is visible, as well as her left eye (right side of the picture), directly gazing at the viewer with a scheming-like, half-opened side-eyed expression.

@superbowl@lemmy.world

 

The summoning requirements were updated

This is a drawing I just made in Sketchbook out of ongoing political anxieties, not sure whether it fits here, especially due to the implied subjects (ongoing politics and religious symbols). Please let me know if it doesn't fit here. Feedback is appreciated...

Alt-text (in case Lemmy doesn't pull it from Calckey instance I'm hosted at): An absurdist, surreal drawing depicting an elder man (a Merlin-like wizard), full with gray hair and beard, dressed in purple robe, amidst the woods during night. He kneels before a pentacle circle drawn on the ground, which is surrounded by five black candles. Both the pentacle and the candles are glowing and lit, with the pentacle emitting a purple glow. Hovering above the pentacle, however, is a bureaucratic, quite legalese text glowing purple: "Age verification required! You must be 18 years old or older to do summonings. Follow the instructions to upload your biometrics and a valid government-issued ID. By proceeding, you agree with the terms and the collection of any required personal data. We and our 72 partners will validate your request in up to 72 hours. Charges may apply." The wizard gazes at the hovering text with an unamused expression.

@justpost@lemmy.world

150
Smile for the selfie (s3.eu-central-2.wasabisys.com)
 

Smile for the selfie

"Why so serious?"

Source: "The Burrowing Owl’s Cozy Underground Home", website "The Kids Should See This", originally from photographer Mac Stone (couldn't confirm this specific authorship because the website links to some YouTube-hosted video and I don't use YouTube anymore; I found the photo through the mentioned website)

Alt-text: Two Athene cunicularia (burrowing owl) amidst a seemingly endless leveled grassland during daylight. One of them is very close to the camera, as if she were taking a selfie, staring directly at the camera with a serious and quite menacing expression. Behind her, not too far, the second owl is gazing at the sky.

@superbowl@lemmy.world

 

Sobre a Lei 15.211

Amanhã entra em vigor a tal da lei que, "vedada a autodeclaração", exige verificações de idade até mesmo ao nível de sistema operacional. É tão amplo e incerto que até mesmo distros como MidnightBSD bloqueou IPs brasileiros, e a tendência é que outros sigam o mesmo caminho.

Confesso que estou perdendo o infinitesimal resquício de sanidade mental que ainda tenho, pois essa lei me afeta pessoalmente.

Isso porque, há cerca de 2 anos, me converti ao ocultismo, num país de maioria cristã onde intolerância religiosa é estrutural.

Fora da Internet, tento evitar falar sobre minha crença atual já que, nas várias vezes que o fiz, levei desde sermão de comerciante ("quem faz pacto com o Lúcifer cai em perdição") até a diagnóstico de esquizotipico ("pensamento mágico") da psiquiatra. Outro dia desses deu de tentar explicar minha visão sobre Lilith pro meu vizinho, apenas para eu ouvir "quando tiver lá no céu vou te ligar e perguntar como tá as coisas no inferno", isso embalado em tom de "piada" só porque ele tem relação simbiótica comigo envolvendo a chácara dele, não fosse isso o julgamento não viria em tom de piada, mas sim em tom de agressão mesmo.

Pessoas são agredidas por motivo de crença. E a Justiça, que deveria garantir (Art. 208 do CP) liberdade religiosa prevista na Constituição, apreende estátua de Baphomet do templo de Quimbanda Luciferiana, e julga que foi a Mãe de Santo quem teria sido intolerante com o motorista de Uber que recusou corrida com motivo "sangue de Jesus tem poder". Se essas vítimas, que têm toda uma egrégora registrada como instituição religiosa (templos e terreiros), sofrem ataques estruturais até mesmo da própria Justiça, imagine eu, que não pertenço a nenhuma egrégora específica porque sigo crença própria sincrética. Não tenho templos de Quimbanda ou terreiros de Candomblé pra me auxiliar legalmente no direito da prática religiosa.

Então limito-me à expressão online... exceto que meu conteúdo é geralmente NSFW, dado que muito da imageria envolvendo Lilith aborda temas tabu.

Diante de uma lei dessa, onde preciso provar ser adulto, "vedada a autodeclaração", pra ler e postar, meu CPF ficaria atrelado à minha atividade ocultista online. Não precisa ser nenhum especialista em T.I. pra saber que softwares têm falhas. Exemplo é o Discord que, meras semanas após botar validação de idade, teve tudo isso vazado.

Sim, o Brasil tem a LGPD, mas LGPD não me protege de consequências após o vazamento das minhas postagens ocultistas que passaria a estar vinculado ao meu CPF. Se nem Art. 208 me protege da intolerância estrutural, quiçá LGPD cujo escopo sequer trata isso.

Já estou desempregado por vários fatores, e ter RH conseguindo saber que sou ocultista seria, definitivamente, minha morte social (se já não estou morto socialmente, mas daí já são outros quinhentos).

Há vários outros pontos mas não cabe nesse fio.

Dito tudo isso, alguém tá sabendo como vai ser, na prática, essa lei?

@batepapo@lemmy.eco.br

view more: next ›