(I took the last summary part only for obvious reasons)
Result is hilarious but I couldn't agree more. Here's the prompt:
what's your overall view of this project? what major design flaws do you see or good design decisions you like? be brutal, reality check time
edit: clarification before you guys jump me, the company paid for agentic editing to give it a shot and this is the first thing I asked
aka zionists
Yeah, there are massive projects that serve as a frontend to a subset of ffmpeg features.
no GTA 6
Humans aren't physically violent enough to survive a much smaller creature (30-50kg), let alone fighting something just as violent but 10 times bigger.
I would really pay to watch that fight.
I use keepassxc + syncthing, super easy to setup and decentralized.
it s not even worth pirating
Seems like something that could fit here
I was taking the CCNA course then tests in 2013. I remember how they were pushing their IoT prediction in the courses so hard.
IoT ended up cringe af. To control your vacuum cleaner, it needs to connect to a remote API server hosted in AWS then back to you sitting next to the vacuum cleaner. I could say at the time nobody wants that shit. Now I hate it even more and I skip all the smart products.
I have a similar feeling about LLMs now. They are nice, they solve some problems nicely, they are far from perfect, I dont want them shoved everywhere.
I get your point. But Microsoft knows exactly who is using their cloud and why (id proof and industry), vs something for everyone to grab (LF doesnt require id proof and industry). Microsoft is knowingly serving child murderers and it knows their tech is used to do exactly that.
You cannot ban kitchen knives because there were a mass stab, but you enforce strict background check so you dont sell rifles to school shooters.
In other words, impossible to enforce linux ban without removing the open source aspect of it and affect good people like, but totally possible just not serve somebody commiting a genocide.
nobody is profiting from that, so that's not her point. Linux foundation isnt directly selling something used to detect a blow up kids
