im_fine_sandy

That's not really how the political cycle works. An expensive policy like this needs to be taken to an election, so people can decide whether they really think it's a good idea. If they get elected then they have a mandate to implement it.

My translation is: if people keep complaining about whatever bonds are we can invade Greenland or Uzbekistan or Herd Island.

You seem to have misunderstood, and the article you linked doesn't contradict what I've said.

Wealthy, sophisticated LLM developers would not have been scraping old reddit. They would pay reddit for API access.

Shutting down old reddit closes the door on back yard developers, not OpenAI.

Additionally, when you run a prompt in a chatbot, it doesn't scurry away and scrape old reddit and then formulate an answer. The scraping of content is going on while the model is being developed.

OpenAI would not have been scraping old ui?

Also most reddit content has long since been injested. No need to visit your http site anymore

You’ve fundamentally misunderstood the technology.

Oh, silly me. They have intuition and just say the first thing that they think of.

Haah. Sweet.

Such small dick energy. Look at this amazing car that I pretend is mine.

I still like to chuckle about his fluffer from that arrest video, I wonder what he's up to now.

Trump is too pathetic to suicide himself.

Although I can imagine someone else suiciding him.

LOL.

We're discussing whether LLMs can think and have intuition.

My point is, just because we can't read the probability matrix with which they formulate their answers, does not mean they have intuition.

An LLM can't read the matrix in which it stores its own parameters?

That's like saying a human can't read the neurons in their own brain. Sure, looking at them through a microscope, we can not.

You don't seem to have any idea what you're talking about.

Humans can not read or understand the probability matrix in which an LLM stores its parameters.

Incorrect.

LLMs do not have "thoughts" or "intuition" by any definition.

They organise tokens into groups based on statistical probability, and convert those tokens into words and sentences.

They can explain why they resolved a given answer, but he answer is always unsatisfying: this accumulation of tokens seemed to be the most likely response based on my probability matrix.

The problem you're trying to convey is that humans can not summarise or read or understand a probability matrix with many billions of parameters.

Nah, it's way easier to just make up profound sounding pronouncements like "the water wars have already started" than to actually read something or challenge your misconceptions.

You're right of course. People have been fighting over access to water since forever.