innerwar

joined 1 year ago
[–] innerwar@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago

First time I’m seeing this accusation. I don’t suppose you got anything to support this? It’s looks like it’s funded publicly. They are asking for support a lot. I’m actually considering giving them some money. They look legit

[–] innerwar@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 month ago

“As soon as the land of any country has all become private property, the landlords, like all other men, love to reap where they never sowed, and demand a rent even for its natural produce. The wood of the forest, the grass of the field, and all the natural fruits of the earth, which, when land was in common, cost the labourer only the trouble of gathering them, come, even to him, to have an additional price fixed upon them. He must then pay for the licence to gather them, and must give up to the landlord a portion of what his labour either collects or produces. This portion, or, what comes to the same thing, the price of this portion, constitutes the rent of land, and in the price of the greater part of commodities, makes a third”

                                ― Adam Smith, quote from The Wealth of Nations

Couldn’t find exactly where from the book it’s from unfortunately, freakonomics has a good series on him. It was the university of Chicago that perverted his messege

[–] innerwar@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He was against landlord on principle. Even he knew the parasites that would come out of them. Let me see if I can get a quote that summed him up nicely from his book “wealth of economics”

[–] innerwar@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

I feel you. I am close to this situation but maybe it is time to throw caution to the wind. If not now when? Take up those arms, get the food stuffs to last in a siege. Take precatuions

[–] innerwar@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

Thank you for this effort. My biggest wish for more proportional representation. That I feel like would help bridge rural and urban places. My biggest problem I foresee selling this is, how do we pay for all these wishes. I suppose it would be the wealth tax. Here’s hoping they can make the math math

[–] innerwar@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

Hell yeah, we been riding the economic advantage of providing weapons and not loosing people or infrastructure. Now imagine if the government just ordered a bunch of housing, yeah sure they go into debt but people become more productive

[–] innerwar@lemmy.ca 29 points 2 months ago

I’ll choose to believe my own reality of a little village that said fuck off, And had magic thank you very much

[–] innerwar@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What the fuck did I just read? Specifically targeting left leaning groups? What possible reason would an org like nato need that for?!

[–] innerwar@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

This is going to be viewed as a conspiracy to keep people out of power. Further dividing us. I’m all for staying in Canada. These people shouldn’t have gotten to this stage. But what do we do with all the angst of the federal government.

[–] innerwar@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

Personally and perhaps others would make some sacrifices for co-ops. Whatever’s that’s worth.

[–] innerwar@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago (5 children)

good tidbit about high maintenance planes.

If it can’t exist without being premium prices and offering, does that mean this is now a new thing the lower class cannot have? Ability to fly,

Digression, This feels like a disease of costs. They always have to climb, somebody has to be sacrificed to reach these new ever higher luxuries. I see the same in my industry. And I want to slam on the brakes and yell “not that fast”

Perhaps this gave me a glimmer of hope, can a company operate without all the overhead of middle men. As I believe you’re correctly pointing out, it can operate on marginally profits, but the risks are too high. When mistakes are made there’s no room in the books

[–] innerwar@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago (11 children)

Is this viable as a concept? Like say he builds enough money, and those people that bought own a part of it.

view more: next ›