istewart

joined 3 months ago
[–] istewart@awful.systems 13 points 2 months ago

User requests something that accommodates their actual use-case. Altman responds by dismissing it as "toys," in that same cultivated faux-casual lowercase smarm that constitutes the bulk of his public identity. This man is not fit to be an executive.

[–] istewart@awful.systems 19 points 2 months ago

I used to be a serious systems programmer like you once, then I took a prompt injection in the knee

[–] istewart@awful.systems 8 points 2 months ago

They are practically handing you free leverage

[–] istewart@awful.systems 6 points 2 months ago

I feel like it’s too much to hope that even the HN crowd have figured out Balaji S. is a more prolific bullshit machine than any LLM…

[–] istewart@awful.systems 9 points 2 months ago

This is going to drag out for years, as such things do... and I would not at all be surprised if, a couple years in, Nvidia turns around and starts a PR blitz along the lines of, "tee-hee, that genAI bubble wasn't nearly as big as we thought it would be! Look what happened to our revenue and stock price! Monopolists, lil ol' us?!"

In other words, good on the prosecutors, but I feel like they're only doing this now because of the mainstream hype that AI is inevitable and will conquer all industries.

[–] istewart@awful.systems 8 points 2 months ago

I feel like Newsweek has been vaguely pro-Trump / at the very least "both sides" clickbait since their last buyout. So it's very impressive that they're willing to publish straightforward information that Bitcoin is a thin, highly manipulated market. Bravo!

[–] istewart@awful.systems 6 points 2 months ago

300 lines of LLM-laundered Python in a trenchcoat

[–] istewart@awful.systems 8 points 2 months ago

I store my unable right next to my unicycle :)

[–] istewart@awful.systems 7 points 2 months ago (4 children)

It's remarkable to me how far and how rapidly this guy swerved outside of his initial lane, all while having absolutely terrible voice and diction for being a long-form interviewer. He's worked on that, but it's clear that his initial success was based off of targeting high-level professionals who otherwise wouldn't very often be sought out for the type of interviews Lex does. I'm thinking of guys like Jim Keller and Chris Lattner, who would probably only make such public appearances in the form of keynotes at conferences for their specific niches.

But you can't convince me that you're really the world's best technical interviewer if you're also uncritically sitting down with Donald fucking Trump, or deciding that you're suddenly enough of a historian to take on Gibbon with your fucking podcast. Who's financing this guy, anyway? Is MIT actually kicking him cash, or is it just an RMS scenario where they give him space because they're concerned about where he might end up otherwise?

[–] istewart@awful.systems 7 points 2 months ago

She's still a go-to for celebrities who want to be seen as telling raw, difficult truths; Harry and Meghan obviously being the flagship example. They're surely trying to piggyback off that here.

[–] istewart@awful.systems 4 points 2 months ago

Aww, how nice, Sam got his hair done professionally. And they gave him the Nimoy cut!

[–] istewart@awful.systems 4 points 2 months ago

It makes sense that he would want back on the only grift train that ever treated him so well. Post-Trump/Vance Thielworld is likely to be a particularly sad place, though.

view more: ‹ prev next ›