janAkali

No? Most of his stuff are terrible movies.

But, I am watching them for fucking around with cool ideas and crazy visual scenes. Couldn't care less about plot, characters, sometimes logic, etc.

This is just another layer. Order in 8/2(2+2) is still not clear if you understand the division symbol correctly.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_operations#Mixed_division_and_multiplication

Both are right, depending on who you ask:

most people see:

8 / 2 * (2+2) = 16

math people see "juxtaposition" instead of multiplication, it has precedence over multiplication and division:

5 / 2a = 5 / (2 * a)

Math notation just sucks and is not standard in general, everyone just tries to avoid ambiguity like in this equation.

> zweihander

Nim

type
  AOCSolution[T,U] = tuple[part1: T, part2: U]
  Vec3 = tuple[x,y,z: int]
  Node = ref object
    pos: Vec3
    cid: int

proc dist(a,b: Vec3): float =
  sqrt(float((a.x-b.x)^2 + (a.y-b.y)^2 + (a.z-b.z)^2))

proc solve(input: string, p1_limit: int): AOCSolution[int, int] =
  let boxes = input.splitLines().mapIt:
    let parts = it.split(',')
    let pos = Vec3 (parseInt parts[0], parseInt parts[1], parseInt parts[2])
    Node(pos: pos, cid: -1)

  var dists: seq[(float, (Node, Node))]
  for i in 0 .. boxes.high - 1:
    for j in i+1 .. boxes.high:
      dists.add (dist(boxes[i].pos, boxes[j].pos), (boxes[i], boxes[j]))

  var curcuits: Table[int, HashSet[Node]]
  var curcuitID = 0

  dists.sort(cmp = proc(a,b: (float, (Node, Node))): int = cmp(a[0], b[0]))

  for ind, (d, nodes) in dists:
    var (a, b) = nodes
    let (acid, bcid) = (a.cid, b.cid)

    if acid == -1 and bcid == -1: # new curcuit
      a.cid = curcuitID
      b.cid = curcuitID
      curcuits[curcuitId] = [a, b].toHashSet
      inc curcuitID
    elif bcid == -1: # add to a
      b.cid = acid
      curcuits[acid].incl b
    elif acid == -1: # add to b
      a.cid = bcid
      curcuits[bcid].incl a
    elif acid != bcid: # merge two curcuits
      for node in curcuits[bcid]:
        node.cid = acid
      curcuits[acid].incl curcuits[bcid]
      curcuits.del bcid

    if ind+1 == p1_limit:
      result.part1 = curcuits.values.toseq.map(len).sorted()[^3..^1].prod

    if not(acid == bcid and acid != -1): result.part2 = a.pos.x * b.pos.x

Runtime: 364 ms

Part 1:
I compute all pairs of Euclidean distances between 3D points, sort them, then connect points into circuits, using, what I think is called a Union‑Find algorithm (circuits grow or merge). After exactly 1000 connections (including redundant ones), I take the three largest circuits and multiply their sizes.

Part 2:
While iterating through the sorted connections, I also calculate the product of each pair x‑coordinates. The last product is a result for part 2.

Problems I encountered while doing this puzzle:

• I've changed a dozen of data structures, before settled on curcuitIDs and ref objects stored in a HashTable (~ 40 min)
• I did a silly mistake of mutating the fields of an object and then using new fields as keys for the HashTable (~ 20 min)
• I am stil confused and don't understand why do elves count already connected junction boxes (~ 40 min, had to look it up, otherwise it would be a lot more)

Time to solve Part 1: 1 hour 56 minutes
Time to solve Part 2: 4 minutes

Full solution at Codeberg: solution.nim

Nim

Another simple one.

Part 1: count each time a beam crosses a splitter.
Part 2: keep count of how many particles are in each column in all universes
(e.g. with a simple 1d array), then sum.

Runtime: ~~116 μs~~ ~~95 µs~~ 86 µs

type
  AOCSolution[T,U] = tuple[part1: T, part2: U]

proc solve(input: string): AOCSolution[int, int] =
  var beams = newSeq[int](input.find '\n')
  beams[input.find 'S'] = 1

  for line in input.splitLines():
    var newBeams = newSeq[int](beams.len)
    for pos, cnt in beams:
      if cnt == 0: continue
      if line[pos] == '^':
        newBeams[pos-1] += cnt
        newBeams[pos+1] += cnt
        inc result.part1
      else:
        newbeams[pos] += cnt
    beams = newBeams
  result.part2 = beams.sum()

Update: found even smaller and faster version that only needs a single array.
Update #2: small optimization

type
  AOCSolution[T,U] = tuple[part1: T, part2: U]

proc solve(input: string): AOCSolution[int, int] =
  var beams = newSeq[int](input.find '\n')
  beams[input.find 'S'] = 1

  for line in input.splitLines():
    for pos, c in line:
      if c == '^' and beams[pos] > 0:
        inc result.part1
        beams[pos-1] += beams[pos]
        beams[pos+1] += beams[pos]
        beams[pos] = 0
  result.part2 = beams.sum()

Full solution at Codeberg: solution.nim

Nim

The hardest part was reading the part 2 description. I literally looked at it for minutes trying to understand where the problem numbers come from and how they're related to the example input. But then it clicked.

The next roadblock was that my template was stripping whitespace at the end of the last line, making parsing a lot harder. I've replaced strip() with strip(chars={'\n'}) to keep the trailing space intact.

Runtime: ~~1.4 ms~~ 618 μs

type
  AOCSolution[T,U] = tuple[part1: T, part2: U]

proc solve(input: string): AOCSolution[int, int] =
  let lines = input.splitLines()
  let numbers = lines[0..^2]
  let ops = lines[^1]

  block p1:
    let numbers = numbers.mapIt(it.splitWhiteSpace().mapIt(parseInt it))
    let ops = ops.splitWhitespace()
    for x in 0 .. numbers[0].high:
      var res = numbers[0][x]
      for y in 1 .. numbers.high:
        case ops[x]
        of "*": res *= numbers[y][x]
        of "+": res += numbers[y][x]
      result.part1 += res

  block p2:
    var problems: seq[(char, Slice[int])]
    var ind = 0
    while ind < ops.len:
      let len = ops.skipWhile({' '}, ind+1)
      problems.add (ops[ind], ind .. ind + len - (if ind+len < ops.high: 1 else: 0))
      ind += len + 1

    for (op, cols) in problems:
      var res = 0
      for x in cols:
        var num = ""
        for y in 0 .. numbers.high:
          num &= numbers[y][x]

        if res == 0:
          res = parseInt num.strip
        else:
          case op
          of '*': res *= parseInt num.strip
          of '+': res += parseInt num.strip
          else: discard

      result.part2 += res

Full solution at Codeberg: solution.nim

+1 shitty superpower ideas
I should really start writing them down at this point.

Nim

Huh, I didn't expect two easy days in a row.
Part 1 is a range check. Part 2 is a range merge.

Runtime: ~720 µs

type
  AOCSolution[T,U] = tuple[part1: T, part2: U]

proc merge[T](ranges: var seq[Slice[T]]) =
  ranges.sort(cmp = proc(r1, r2: Slice[T]): int = cmp(r1.a, r2.a))
  var merged = @[ranges[0]]
  for range in ranges.toOpenArray(1, ranges.high):
    if range.a <= merged[^1].b:
      if range.b > merged[^1].b:
        merged[^1].b = range.b
    else:
      merged.add range
  ranges = merged

proc solve(input: string): AOCSolution[int, int] =
  let chunks = input.split("\n\n")
  var freshRanges = chunks[0].splitLines().mapIt:
    let t = it.split('-'); t[0].parseInt .. t[1].parseInt

  freshRanges.merge()

  block p1:
    let availableFood = chunks[1].splitLines().mapIt(parseInt it)
    for food in availableFood:
      for range in freshRanges:
        if food in range:
          inc result.part1
          break

  block p2:
    for range in freshRanges:
      result.part2 += range.b-range.a+1

Full solution at Codeberg: solution.nim

Nim

type
  AOCSolution[T,U] = tuple[part1: T, part2: U]
  Vec2 = tuple[x,y: int]

proc removePaper(rolls: var seq[string]): int =
  var toRemove: seq[Vec2]
  for y, line in rolls:
    for x, c in line:
      if c != '@': continue
      var adjacent = 0
      for (dx, dy) in [(-1,-1),(0,-1),(1,-1),
                       (-1, 0),       (1, 0),
                       (-1, 1),(0, 1),(1, 1)]:
        let pos: Vec2 = (x+dx, y+dy)
        if pos.x < 0 or pos.x >= rolls[0].len or
           pos.y < 0 or pos.y >= rolls.len: continue
        if rolls[pos.y][pos.x] == '@': inc adjacent

      if adjacent < 4:
        inc result
        toRemove.add (x, y)

  for (x, y) in toRemove: rolls[y][x] = '.'

proc solve(input: string): AOCSolution[int, int] =
  var rolls = input.splitLines()
  result.part1 = rolls.removePaper()
  result.part2 = result.part1
  while (let cnt = rolls.removePaper(); result.part2 += cnt; cnt) > 0:
    discard

Today was so easy, that I decided to solve it twice, just for fun. First is a 2D traversal (see above). And then I did a node graph solution in a few minutes (in repo below). Both run in ~27 ms.

It's a bit concerning, because a simple puzzle can only mean that tomorrow will be a nightmare. Good Luck everyone, we will need it.

Full solution is at Codeberg: solution.nim