jannaultheal

If she has such a weak laning phase, why not bypass it by not laning at all? Her clear is decent since her E is %missing hp damage. Start blue and full clear towards red side, then base (or gank if the opportunity is good, but that's very rare).

There are tons of women who enjoy the damsel in distress trope and think it's harmless fun.

There are also tons of women who think it perpetuates sexist stereotypes against women.

Both groups of women's opinions are equally valid.

Does this not prove that the statement is independent?

The Millennium Prize Problems are 7 math problems with a $1 million reward for solving them. Only one of them, the Poincare conjecture, is solved, and the other 6 are unsolved.

How would you rank them based on difficulty of understanding what the question is asking?

I googled it and it's a higher form of number theory that involves things like"abelian extensions" and "absolute Galois groups". I've taken a course in Galois theory so I understand a little bit of that, but how is it related to number theory?

(Not my post - I found this on reddit and thought it was a different and intriguing point of view : https://www.reddit.com/r/aiwars/comments/1iniuih/ai_boyfriendsgirlfriends_are_empowering/ )

Have you ever heard the saying "I'm a strong independent woman who doesn't need a man"? Well I think the same about people who are dating AI. They don't need a person of the opposite gender (or the same gender, if they're homosexual) to satisfy their romantic desires. That makes them strong and independent. They don't rely on others. They solved a problem in their life all by themselves. This is why I think that dating an AI is empowering.

Note that I phrased this as gender-neutral (except the quote) - both men and women are empowered by dating an AI.

(In a comment by the OP, they clarified that they're talking about locally run, open source AI bf/gfs)

More precisely, is there a "natural" statement (a statement that isn't deliberately constructed to be an example) that can be stated in PA, proved in ZFC, but not provable in PA?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B04H8gF2GyY 3:27 and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iMkCXuZiYaw 1:11

I have an idea for a game: It's the usual "a princess is kidnapped by a dragon and a brave knight is on a quest to rescue her" story. But you (the player) plays as the princess, who is somehow helping the knight on his quest.

The issue is that since the player is playing as a trapped character, I want to make the player feel trapped, but I don't know how to do that.

My original idea is that the princess telepathically communicates with the knight and tells him what to do. But this doesn't work, the gameplay is identical to the player playing as the knight. How can I make the gameplay feel like the player is playing as the princess (and thus feel trapped) instead of the knight?

voracious is gone, ruinous now gives you all the petals, and extra damage when you kill people.

Reddit admins forced the mods of /r/changemyview to ban the discussion of transgender topics. Is there a version of /r/changemyview here that allows transgender topics?

By "girly" games I mean : games that have a soft/pink color scheme. About slice of life (preferably with romance elements), and non-violent with no/minimal combat.

I've already played Stardew Valley, Minecraft and Animal Crossing.

It's a bug , you can accidentally sell recall, and there's no way to get it back. I don't know if it's been fixed yet, but for now, just avoid playing until it gets fixed.