killingspark

joined 2 months ago
[–] killingspark@feddit.org 2 points 1 hour ago

Yeah I remember reading about it. This is probably a step in the right direction without having looked at all the details

[–] killingspark@feddit.org 32 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

Stopping the wealth accumulation at the top through taxes on property above a threshold.

And, supplementary:

Stopping tax evasion by implementing a global tax cooperative so nations can stop competing in a downward race on tax rates

[–] killingspark@feddit.org 5 points 7 hours ago

Nono you see only with a strong man a woman is free to be a real woman! Free to look pretty, get pregnant, make the house tidy and cook delicious food. The things women enjoy!

/s Just in case I wasn't being over the top enough to make this obvious sarcasm a

[–] killingspark@feddit.org 6 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

South Korea has one of the worst reproduction rates of the world, caused by women deciding to not choose a man to spend their life with but to live their own life. Which apparently causes men to freak out and go conservative

[–] killingspark@feddit.org 7 points 16 hours ago

I'll take "beautiful parking lot" as a compliment and there is nothing you can do about it

[–] killingspark@feddit.org 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Dingos would hunt at packice holes if they had access to them?

[–] killingspark@feddit.org 12 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Honestly I hate clouds of strawberry hitting me even more than regular cigarette smoke

[–] killingspark@feddit.org 3 points 2 weeks ago

I just wanted to say that the differences between Söder and Merz arent that big compared to other people that once were in the talks

[–] killingspark@feddit.org 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The more interesting canidates would have been Günther or Wüst, both of them are currently ruling their states together with the green party and seem happy about what they were able to achieve there. Söder and Merz only differ a bit on how much they love bavaria.

[–] killingspark@feddit.org 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If it's truly "not all men" then you don't need to take everything online at face value if you aren't one of the toxic men that this post is addressing.

Using the word men to criticise only the toxic ones and telling all the ones that aren't toxic to just not feel addressed is pretty weird to me.

[–] killingspark@feddit.org 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Or where that mysterious starvation is coming from that might possibly be going on

[–] killingspark@feddit.org 1 points 2 weeks ago

I think protesting against the vote of the average Joe in a way that affects the average Joe is quite valid. The politicians got voted for their policies, they wouldn't be doing their jobs if they just shifted their whole position because of a protests that are expressing quite old ideas. The average Joe has to stand up and vote for people that actually want the change we need.

The pressure regarding queer rights was successful because it became a less and less favourable position to be against those same rights in the public view. Being conservative regarding fighting the climate change is still a pretty favourable position so not enough pressure can be built by protests against politicians alone.

And, one aspect that is overlooked in the discussion, at least in my opinion: People are allowed to be angry at the state of the world and the popular opinions, and express that anger publicly and in the face of the general public. This is a valid thing to do.

view more: next ›