Nothing, bias from the .NET Framework days probably

LaTeX spitting out an immaculate pdf with carefully calculated text distribution and vectorized fonts just to have it printed and scanned by the camera on a razr flip phone:

Yippee I missed these

Still not enough, or at least pi is not known to have this property. You need the number to be "normal" (or a slightly weaker property) which turns out to be hard to prove about most numbers.

Bitcoin is more widely seen as a vehicle for speculation rather than a decentralized currency. Unlucky.

I'm a tolerant person, but come on, man. Between VSCode, JetBrains, (n)vim and emacs, and I can't think of a legitimate reason to use np++ for development over any of them.

A 1-torus is a circle, you mean an annulus. You do NOT want to make this mistake at a topologist dinner party, trust me.

No, not really.

Months ago, there was a fiasco because somebody's keynote talk was suddenly and inexplicably downgraded to a regular talk because the Rust Project "did not want to endorse" the talk, despite nominating and encouraging the speaker in the first place. This resulted in the speaker withdrawing their talk, and multiple public apologies from some of the people involved. https://thephd.dev/i-am-no-longer-speaking-at-rustconf-2023

https://hackmd.io/@Manishearth/SkLZzzbLn

https://gist.github.com/m-ou-se/ca7d7edf778a9b93b812512b3d8288f5

Currently there is a fiasco because it turns out (one of?) the voices behind the inexplicable decision to downgrade the talk was dtolnay, lead Serde developer, who recently came under fire for publishing precompiled proc macro binaries in Serde and his response to the ensuing criticism. The perception is that dtolnay, who has done lots of work with proc macros and made several detailed suggestions as to their future in Rust, quashed the RustConf talk because he disagreed with the premise of the talk in favor of his own ideas about macros.

No, just fuck Hexbear in general. Not having the worst possible take on every issue doesn't mean you don't suck ass.

Nobody else wants you to smell like you.

Complaining about a $20 purchase you don't have to make qualifies for "cheapskate" I think. Simply not purchasing it, or not wanting to purchase it, is fine. The difference is entitlement.

They don't. They're just sending these to all communities of a certain size that switched to nsfw recently. Most of them are in fact allowing nsfw content (like profanity) but it doesn't matter. The ones that tried allowing REALLY nsfw content got punished for that too.