lialdd

I love your nose ring!

I think ethics will also have to grapple with the fact that the thousands of humans who created the training data, often without their knowledge or consent, aren't compensated and not only didn't consent to their likeness or work being included but also can't effectively request to be excluded. I see plenty of Emma Watson or other celebrity lookalikes in the same models I've been using, and I don't think you can call yourself ethical while using tools that contain such stuff. No more ethical than the ethics of a person choosing to take a nude photo of themselves and charge money in order to see it, certainly.

Hopefully "no feet" isn't a fetish haha but yeah it's hard enough to get accurate limbs and full body shots at all, it'd take work to please a foot or hand fetishist with AI

It's surprisingly hard to both get the look you're going for and not get any distortions, unless the look you're going for is extremely well represented in the training data (which means, vanilla and uninteresting)

Absolutely, neural nets are mind-blowing even if they run into obvious limitations

I only include on request because it's a chore and often the prompts only bear vague resemblance to what comes out and the prompts are often copy pasted from existing examples, or random. The docs.anydream.xyz site is real useful.

{
  "seed": 1265397458,
  "prompt": "Realistic beautiful woman, ((succubus)), ((nude)), large breasts, nude, legs spread wide, ((eyes closed)), ((open mouth)), perfect teeth, wet oily skin, facing the camera, (evil tattoos covering entire body:1.4), two arms, two legs, horns\n\n\\n<lora:POVDoggy:0.95> 1girls, penis, doggystyle, implied sex, cum",
  "negative_prompt": " flat-chest, skinny, fat, paintings, sketches, (worst quality:2), (low quality:2), (normal quality:2), lowres, ((monochrome)), ((grayscale)), bad anatomy, DeepNegative, low-res, bad anatomy, bad hands, text, error, missing fingers, extra digit, fewer digits, cropped, worst quality, low quality, normal quality, jpeg artifacts, (signature, watermark), usernchild, kid,",
  "cfg_scale": "6",
  "width": 512,
  "height": 768
}

With Deliberate (the spice must flow!)

{
  "seed": 2537105551,
  "prompt": "Photorealistic, hdr, 8k, cinematic, woman, body piercings, blue glowing eyes, large eyes, large iris, sclera, tan skin, looking at camera, queen, regal, jewelry, textured skin, freckles, incredibly detailed",
  "negative_prompt": "(deformed, distorted, disfigured:1.3), poorly drawn, bad anatomy, wrong anatomy, extra limb, missing limb, floating limbs, (mutated hands and fingers:1.4), disconnected limbs, mutation, mutated, ugly, disgusting, blurry, amputation",
  "cfg_scale": "7",
  "width": 512,
  "height": 768
}

These models have a lot of trouble with realistic vaginal sex, I think this one accidentally stumbled onto a clit piercing on top of its usual struggle to separate out vagina, clitoris, and labia. (Sometimes it decides it's anal for no good reason)

Oh trust me this was the best of four lol

"The safe word is 'safe word'" is a pretty lame title for a sexy photo, unless you're a lawyer. I'll just scrap and redo.

Edited

Sorry, edited. The implication was supposed to be that she's telling you what the safe word is, just a little consent play. Not that you're telling her anything. Does she look like the kind of person you can tell what to do?