liv

joined 1 year ago
[–] liv 2 points 4 months ago (14 children)

Yeah I'm not going to let it get between me and takeaways ha ha.

Seriously though as well as being a single data point it was self-reported and I noticed it changed depending on the interlocuter - from memory they told the local paper that the secret is going to church.

[–] liv 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Ah I didn't see it. Thanks for the link, interesting.

On a casual read through: "satellite" is misspelt,  "fibre" is randomly capitalized in the section on fibre quality, typo "team" for "term" in the ethnicity section, and in the employment status section "less" should be "fewer". 😊

[–] liv 2 points 4 months ago (16 children)

I used to know a sprightly 100 year old who still lived alone in their own home. Their longevity advice was "don't eat too many takeaways"! Bet they had a low anticholinergic burden though 😃

[–] liv 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That's another plus about organizations, while they may also think you have to do whatever they say, they're more realistic about what that is because it has likely already been tested in court.

[–] liv 3 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I can if it's not until next week.

[–] liv 2 points 4 months ago
[–] liv 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah New Zealand has a few references to British India. The Coromandel Peninsula is named after the Coromandel Coast in East India.

[–] liv 2 points 4 months ago (18 children)

No, that’s what she’s trying to make you do!

I mean I mentioned it because it's working on me!

Wait why aren't you going to be around in 50 years? Live to 100 go on I dare you.

[–] liv 2 points 4 months ago (3 children)

So you should, "entrepreneurship" is a Big Kids word! 😄

I hear you on the pay cheque. Preferably from a large organization.

As far as I can see being an author in NZ is not what to do if you want money, it's more a side thing done by people who already have good jobs.

[–] liv 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (20 children)

It got me interested in her other work! Turns out I've actually seen one of her documentaries, it's this thing about a Maori family who breed horses in the Ruakines, plays on Maori TV sometimes.

Relevant to OP article though, found this in a review of her book:

As she tells her story, she very clearly identifies the cause of the suffering of those involved in adoption, the archaic 1955 Adoption Act. A policy formed on an ideology that total disconnection between adopted children and their biological parents was essential.

“In all, I had over seventy interactions with government departments. The result was always the same. Yes, they had my files. Yes, any staff member could read those files. But no, I had no right to them.”

If that was her experience, then going forward, feeling like you were being obstructed in an OIA process would reopen a few old wounds. Especially when now here she is at uni and trying to undertake academic research.

I think many people don't realise these days how bad adoption in NZ was, you sort of have to hear about it from the old timers. Teenage"unmarried mothers" were taken to special facilities and when they gave birth their babies were taken, even against their will/without consent in some cases, and never allowed to know who their parents were or why they were adopted or even what their own ethnicity was.

[–] liv 2 points 4 months ago (5 children)

True, true, the only way to make money seems to be self publish and for that you need space for a garage full of books!

I'm not sure what it's like these days but NZ was always so small we don't really need an agent for local publishers, though.

[–] liv 7 points 4 months ago (22 children)

My thoughts are that there are no villains here.

a) being annoyed at being overworked is understandable. (Writing what you really think/personal opinions in an institutional email is crazy though - save it for ftf).

b) wanting access to information for a major research project is also understandable and it's not her fault they are overworked.

c) she's an ex journalist and filmmaker and her current research seems to be about the web of lies and ommissions surrounding historical closed adoptions.

The only way anyone has ever got any traction on institutional "secrets" - everything from baby theft adoptions of the 1960s, child abuse in boarding schools in the 70s, the "Unfortunate Experiment" killing women at National Womens in the 80s, etc etc has been by being a "bitch" and pushing the authorities for information they don't want to part with.

OTOH as an ex journo she knows talking to the media about this will create a bit of buzz around her forthcoming research.

view more: ‹ prev next ›