I had to look it up and it looks like you're right. If only my teacher had spent any effort at all explaining that.

Given that "existing outside" is harmful to it, I'm guessing that the covering is basically required.

That sounds really cool.

Thanks for the reply.

This seems like a great way to ensure that the player can't beat the level. I assume there's a maximum difficulty where the enemy is still possible to beat?

Also, when does the boosted difficulty reset for the level? After beating it? I am not a fan of frustrating games, so I can't even imagine playing a game like this without just quitting.

3000...

The aliens haven't yet consumed our planet in this timeline. Consider yourself lucky.

What did he whisper in her ear?

After watching Pocahontas for the first time in many years, it shocked me that anyone could value personal wealth over coexisting. The antagonist only cares about mining out gold, looking at the hills as having potential as opposed to perceiving them as implicitly valuable as they are. Nature is worth protecting.

If she says "You didn't 'lock her up' like you promised" he'll just turn it around on her and claim that she should be locked up. Chats of "lock her up!" will begin as they completely ignore anything negative said about him.

Just reposting without the tracker: https://youtu.be/L1QVp55ehvs

I was today-years-old when I learned the ideal way to eat a banana.

"Normal transaction" after a fundamental change in how all games that use your product are financially responsible by novel, unmeasurable, and unrealistic metrics. No transaction prior to this kind of announcement is "normal" imo.