[-] lowleveldata@programming.dev 22 points 3 months ago

One user reported it chewing through around 500MB of RAM on 64-bit Windows 7

It says this right in the article. Is reading the article too much to ask?

[-] lowleveldata@programming.dev 22 points 2 years ago

Thank you fellow anal lover

[-] lowleveldata@programming.dev 22 points 2 years ago

Definitely do call. It'd be hell to debug if it only calls sometimes.

[-] lowleveldata@programming.dev 22 points 2 years ago

await and async

[-] lowleveldata@programming.dev 22 points 2 years ago

Remember that kid

No

[-] lowleveldata@programming.dev 21 points 2 years ago

I know right? It's totally 2010 last year

[-] lowleveldata@programming.dev 22 points 2 years ago

I don't think anyone could get away with doing anything today. There's always something.

[-] lowleveldata@programming.dev 22 points 3 years ago

Still a better yuri anime than Euphonium

[-] lowleveldata@programming.dev 22 points 3 years ago

What's Zelda's job?

[-] lowleveldata@programming.dev 22 points 3 years ago

It's the only sane way to implement this. Can't imagine what kind of strange compatibility issues they would run into if they try to run chrome extensions directly.

[-] lowleveldata@programming.dev 21 points 3 years ago

Sorry bro but the real crab is always the compilers

[-] lowleveldata@programming.dev 22 points 3 years ago

ok guys I'm done with reddit

view more: ‹ prev next ›

lowleveldata

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 3 years ago