[-] lysdexic@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

I'm all for syntactic sugar, but these ad-hoc extensions appear to increase the complexity of the language without adding anything relevant in return.

[-] lysdexic@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago

Thanks for the fix. Well done.

[-] lysdexic@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago

The whole site is broken for 2 months now.

[-] lysdexic@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago

I checked !data_structures@programming.dev and it is still broken.

[-] lysdexic@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago

It addresses some of the federation issues some of the PD users are experiencing.

It solves nothing, and feels like spam at this point. I mean, who do you think is not aware they can create an account somewhere else and shift their presence there?

[-] lysdexic@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago

They’re really not. As much as I hate commercial licensing for any dev tools, if you want to talk about superior there’s nothing quite as good as Visual Studio (not code) on Windows.

It really depends on what kind of project you're working on. For .NET projects that might be true, but for other languages such as anything involving C++ then Visual Studio lags way behind CLion, which is multiplatform to boot.

[-] lysdexic@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago

i interpreted the “trend” correctly, “devops” was bastardized away from its original meaning to now mean “sysadmin”, at least in most cases.

I don't think I agree. The role of a sysadmin involved a lot of hand-holding and wrangling low-level details required to keep servers running. DevOps are something completely different. They handle specific infrastructure such as pipelines and deployment scripts, and are in the business of not getting in the way of developers.

[-] lysdexic@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago

Probably was closed

What do you mean "probably was closed"?

[-] lysdexic@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago

This is pure junior energy. Or trolling, I honestly can’t tell.

OP makes a valid point, and a strong one to boot.

Other than name calling, do you have anything to add?

[-] lysdexic@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago

I think I could have states my opinion better. I think LLMs total value remains to be seen. They allow totally incompetent developers to occasionally pass as below average developers.

This is a baseless assertion from your end, and a purely personal one.

My anecdotal evidence is that the best software engineers I know use these tools extensively to get rid of churn and drudge work, and they apply it anywhere and everywhere they can.

[-] lysdexic@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago

the first thing I saw is 150 lines of C# reimplementing functions available in the .NET standard lib.

Once again: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect

[-] lysdexic@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago

Have you ever worked at large old corporation?

I'm not sure you understand that it's way more than "large old corporations" that use it. Everyone uses it, from large multinationals to small one-taxi shops, and even guys like you and me in personal projects. This has been going on for years. I really don't know what led you to talk about large old corporations, seriously.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

lysdexic

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 3 years ago
MODERATOR OF