minfapper

whether GLP-1 use among those with diabetes had an effect on mental health, self-rated health, employment, and marriage. Yet, in a surprising twist, they found that the drugs had no meaningful impact on these categories.

So, we get to lose weight without depression? How is that not a win?!

Legit I don't think I can recognize any of those characters, and I thought I was a pretty big weeb.

Closest we've got is companies not actively union busting

Eh, it's less about defeatism and more that I'm watching a fight between two assholes so I'm finding it hard to empathize with either side.

Like... Publishers regularly screwed over consumers, content creators, and tried to break the web multiple times. They can bleed for all I care

Unfortunately, we're not going to get an over supply of DRAM once the bubble pops.

Most of the current production is HBM, which is juuust architecturally different enough from DRAM to not be useful for desktop computers

Here's a pretty important one:

https://keepandroidopen.org/

I hate to break it to you, but we're never getting rid of AI.

Like how we will forever have trace amounts of cesium and PFAS/microplastics in our blood, AI generated content is going to be around in most things.

The question is will you also use it for good, or just leave it for the bad actors only?

Eh, not being able to explain it elegantly on the spot in front of people understandable.

But if can't come up with a simple explanation even when you're by yourself with all the time in the world, then yeah you probably don't understand it well enough.

It's for people that say "it's a complex topic. You wouldn't be able to understand it". Bitch, the human brain is amazing. People can understand anything they want to. You're just too lazy to help them.

Nah, make a stop at the steam refund button on your way there

By default pull requests my new contributors require approval from someone with write-access to the repo before running actions.

These repos have specifically decided to change a setting to make them not require approval for anyone. The UI to change that setting explicitly warns you about exactly this attack, so this "article" feels like a non-item trying to farm engagement.

Hah! They don't care about "builders" or users. They care about business. Specifically large enterprises the have too many people to care about a single employee's individual productivity.

Microsoft caters mostly to them and is quite good at that.

But if you're an end user, gamer, or individual consumer, just move to Linux already. They don't care about you.

The core of the problem trickles down to weak CI/CD configurations that grant pull requests (PRs) more permissions than they should have.

How exactly do their competitors like codeberg do better in preventing that?