Just to add - this "hat" would also likely improve reception.

Looks like a bi flag to me.

It's from the SPLC report, so it's their methodology:

https://www.splcenter.org/news/2020/03/18/methodology-how-hate-groups-are-identified-and-categorized

I see that there is a substantial difference between the two parties, and equating them is, at best, disingenuous.

Eh, I have a couple of issues with that. For one, I doubt CF would even respond to this. I could easily see them using this very writeup to sue, with all the admissions in it.

The bigger part though, is calling an online casino, whose own IT team (the writer) admitted they were knowingly abusing the plan they were on, the "little guy".

Are they small in comparison to Cloudflare? Absolutely, those schmucks have way too much control of the internet. Calling an online casino, whose own staff lied in the title, the little guy though... Doesn't sit right with me.

No, I'm not going to side with them, or with CF. I'm going to make my assumptions off what I know (two terrible companies, one of which has a liar writing an article where they pretend to not have admittted to their own lies about the subject), and I'm going to assume this:

• Terrible casino used a plan they know they shouldn't have been on.
• Terrible casino would have known what their traffic looked like for a long time.
• Awful CF noticed, and said "Hey guys, wrong plan, talk to sales."
• Terrible casino threatened to just leave awfuo CF.
• Awful CF demands a year up front to ensure their costs are covered for previous abuse of the TOS.
• Awful CF figures "screw it, they are stringing us along, just cut them off so we don't spend more money. TOS violation makes it easy."
• Idiot IT from terrible online casino writes an article (stupidly) in which they admit to TOS violations, and pretends not to know about their own traffic from a resource they are relying on.

Seems pretty obvious to me. Barring further details, my assumptions are based on what I know, and I am perfectly happy sticking to that.

You do you.

That is not a KDE issue.

Only reason I still have prime is simple - diapers. I save enough on them alone to justify it. But once that's done (another year-ish), I don't think it will be worth it anymore.

And yet, I still don't use prime video. It's just not a good experience, and obviously getting worse. And as I have kids, the management of what I'm ok with them seeing is way easier on JF than prime video.

Fuck Seinfeld too.

Sometimes you can blame the partnership agreement for that. Some manufacturers will have a MAP (minimum advertised price) and the distributor would be in violation of their contract if they showed it publicly.

Though that just shifts to being a manufacturer problem with the same result. Just saying it may not be the distributor being weird about pricing.

Proxmox.

Each service becomes an LXC. Docker containers can be migrated to LXC, or be contained within an LXC dedicated to docker.

Running out of processing power? Add another server, add to a cluster, and migrate services (LXC or VM) over.

Having run Fedora, Debian, Ubuntu, CentOS, RHEL, slack, even Oracle Linux - Proxmox is what I run for myself (and some clients).

Applied Behavior Analysis therapy.

Gatekeeping aside....

LMDE on somewhat recent hardware with an iGPU. My wife has not asked me a single question, mostly since she opens the laptop, opens firefox, does whatever, closes laptop. An absolutely typical user.

Sometimes she even clicks on the update popup.